Cotto > Erik Morales, Gatti and ODLH
Collapse
-
Cotto is the better polished boxer, with more amatuer experience.Comment
-
[QUOTE=IMDAZED;5780953]
i think cotto is a better boxer but tito have the powerComment
-
Comment
-
Skill wise, a prime Morales and De La Hoya were clearly superior to Cotto.
Cotto has more skills than Gatti did but he doesn't have Gatti's toughness and heart.
I'm a big Cotto fan by the way.Comment
-
Comment
-
Cotto is pretty polished - that's why I say it was close. But Tito was a very good boxer in his prime, I don't know what you're talking about. To use the De La Hoya bout is silly. Not only was Tito drained in that bout (his last fight at 147) but he still managed to more effectively impose his game plan of stalking Oscar and wearing him down later. Either way, Tito was a pretty good boxer in his prime. That's not a knock on Cotto at all.Comment
-
Comment
-
No disrespect to these great fighters, but Cotto is a superior boxer than these three. The Cotto that fought Mosley would kill any of these three, and any WW or JW today (except P.Williams). With that said, it does seem like he is declining a bit, but we won't know to this next fight. I mean with Marg there was the plaster matter (that we do not know about), and with Clottey there was the cut. So I guess we will really see where Cotto stands on Nov 14th.
Just FYI, I am not saying that he blows Erik Morales, Gatti and ODLH out of the water. We all know they have certain areas where they excel over Cotto, but overall Cotto IS better.
this is reaching now...Comment
Comment