Is Cotto really weight drained at 145?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GTR
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 2489
    • 53
    • 28
    • 2,918

    #1

    Is Cotto really weight drained at 145?

    Cotto Nuthuggers...

    Is Cotto really weight drained at 145? or would it be a fair/even fight?

    If all you Cotto nuthuggers/Pac Haters say so, then why not put your money on Pac instead? If you really believe that at 145 weigh-in then blowin up 15-20 lbs on fight night that hes still shot/drained then wtf i dont know what else to say...
  • MANGLER
    Sex Tape Flop Artist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 30142
    • 1,705
    • 2,355
    • 46,598

    #2
    Cotto will be fine.

    Comment

    • Doctor_Tenma
      Monster
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 33313
      • 1,327
      • 1,249
      • 58,127

      #3
      He'll be fine. Still there was no reason for the 145 catch weight.

      Comment

      • 2501
        upinurgirlsguts
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 20211
        • 902
        • 49
        • 28,237

        #4
        he'll be fine. He's weight drained at 140. 145 will be alright.

        Comment

        • RRICAN
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 2134
          • 153
          • 98
          • 8,495

          #5
          Originally posted by KENSHIRO
          He'll be fine. Still there was no reason for the 145 catch weight.
          co-sign bro...145 not his best but hell be aight

          Comment

          • PACBOY
            Live4Boxing
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 2745
            • 1,428
            • 1,899
            • 13,903

            #6
            He wont be fine, but the weight will

            Comment

            • JACK D. RIPPER
              Banned
              • May 2009
              • 5156
              • 237
              • 91
              • 5,854

              #7
              He'll be weight drained, but still good enough to mangle Packy.

              Comment

              • Klitschko2010
                Banned
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 330
                • 43
                • 4
                • 403

                #8
                145 is a decent compromise. He won't be 100% but it's far better than being 70% at 143 or less.

                Comment

                • Spacey1991
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 8885
                  • 247
                  • 282
                  • 18,684

                  #9
                  Originally posted by GTR
                  Cotto Nuthuggers...

                  Is Cotto really weight drained at 145? or would it be a fair/even fight?

                  If all you Cotto nuthuggers/Pac Haters say so, then why not put your money on Pac instead? If you really believe that at 145 weigh-in then blowin up 15-20 lbs on fight night that hes still shot/drained then wtf i dont know what else to say...
                  If it would have absolutely no effect on him then why are they asking him to come down to 145?

                  Comment

                  • CrackYourJaw
                    The Boston Celtics
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 4925
                    • 188
                    • 97
                    • 13,670

                    #10
                    It's a ******ed catch weight...I doubt it'll really effect Cotto that much. Pac shoulda just went for 147, he'd get a lot more credit if he does win.

                    ^^
                    That's the thing, I really doubt it will change the outcome of the fight, pretty ****** decision for Pac's team, I think.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP