Why are this Pacquiao fans crying so much?

[Animalistic]

Pacquiao agreed to fight Cotto knowing the belt would not be on the line! It was part of the contract! It was one of the stipulation and Pacquiao agreed!

[baracuda]

your the one who never stop crying since pac vs cotto was first mentioned...

i dont expect you to stop soon either so........oh well..

[KING_of_ANGLES]

contract aint even sign yet!! LOL

pac should just fight mosley.....

[Animalistic]

your the one who never stop crying since pac vs cotto was first mentioned...

i dont expect you to stop soon either so........oh well..

Why are you *******s crying? Pacquiao agreed to fight Cotto knowing no title would be on the line! It was part of the contract! Is called a stipulation and Pacquiao agreed.

[Animalistic]

contract aint even sign yet!! LOL

pac should just fight mosley.....

He agreed to it and acording to his lawyer they never back down after they agreed to a fight.

[TredKiller]

another thread about this...............

[Spacey1991]

The thing that makes me laugh is when people moaned about what weight it was at loads of guys said "If Cotto agrees to the fight at 145 then there shouldn't be any excuses, he agreed to the contract" or something like that... but when Cotto doesn't put his belt on the line, something Pacquiao agreed to because he signed the contract I hear some people saying "Cotto is being a ***** for not putting his belt on the line!", which one is it? Firstly its if Cotto agreed to the fight there is no excuses about it but when Pacquiao agrees to the contract about it its different... is it double standards?

I mean, people are saying "Pacquiao aint doing anything wrong about making Cotto go down to 145, it was his choice to sign the contract!"

But when its in the contract for Cotto to not put his belt on the line, something that's in the contract... something Pacquiao has obviously agreed to they say "Cotto is scared and being a ***** cause he wont put his belt on the line", how is it different?

[Delagz]

another thread about this...............

Yep another stuped one of cotto nutthugers and Pac man nutthugers why can you guys act like fan of the sport and stop bitchin about so much.

[shadeyfizzle]

Pacquiao agreed to fight Cotto knowing the belt would not be on the line! It was part of the contract! It was one of the stipulation and Pacquiao agreed!

Actually I agree with you. But FYI the belt will be on the line as long as Pacquiao pays the sanctioning so Cotto wont have to. It's already been confirmed the WBO president.

[Animalistic]

The thing that makes me laugh is when people moaned about what weight it was at loads of guys said "If Cotto agrees to the fight at 145 then there shouldn't be any excuses, he agreed to the contract" or something like that... but when Cotto doesn't put his belt on the line, something Pacquiao agreed to because he signed the contract I hear some people saying "Cotto is being a ***** for not putting his belt on the line!", which one is it? Firstly its if Cotto agreed to the fight there is no excuses about it but when Pacquiao agrees to the contract about it its different... is it double standards?

I mean, people are saying "Pacquiao aint doing anything wrong about making Cotto go down to 145, it was his choice to sign the contract!"

But when its in the contract for Cotto to not put his belt on the line, something that's in the contract... something Pacquiao has obviously agreed to they say "Cotto is scared and being a ***** cause he wont put his belt on the line", how is it different?

Clearly double standars.