Bernard Hopkins is starting to grow on me.
Collapse
-
Comment
-
43 is alot worse than 36. You surely can agree with me here can't you?
As close as that fight was and Hopkins being at such an advanced age it's pretty clear to me who would've won had they faced off when B-Hop was 41 or below.
Agree to disagree I guess.Comment
-
Comment
-
At 36 Hopkins was at his peak, and began slowing down right after.Comment
-
you said hopkins lost cause he clinched 160 times. and there's nowhere in judging that says anything about clinching so i'm guessing you just added that rule. clean punching, defense, effective agression, ring generalship, and dont clinch!
also you keep claiming calzaghe was landing punches but you really should watch it again cause he was barely landing anything.Comment
-
Comment
-
Not a lot. Calzaghe defended titles against bums while Hopkins was picking on blown up WWs. So it evens out if you ask me.
Hopkins isn't all that, I hate when people bring up his bull**** ass age. He gets away with cherry picking.Comment
-
Comment
.
Comment