Pacquiao vs Cotto is a title fight!

[JM1]

just want to clear the rumors that cotto wont be defending his wbo belt against pac. also, take note that the wbo have pac as #1

http://www.wbo-int.com/revised/RANKINGS-WBO.asp

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SPORT/07/21/pacquiao.boxing.fight.cotto/

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-boxing-pacquiao21-2009jul21,0,125469.story

ill try to post more links for you people.

[Animalistic]

just want to clear the rumors that cotto wont be defending his wbo belt against pac. also, take note that the wbo have pac as #1

http://www.wbo-int.com/revised/RANKINGS-WBO.asp

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SPORT/07/21/pacquiao.boxing.fight.cotto/

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-boxing-pacquiao21-2009jul21,0,125469.story

ill try to post more links for you people.

No is not going to be a title fight.

Here is WBO president talking about the situation and Cotto's lawyer.

La OMB quiere guisar
El presidente de la Organización Mundial de Boxeo (OMB), Francisco “Paco” Valcárcel, indicó ayer que todavía no queda descartado el que Cotto arriesgue la faja wélter (147 libras) de dicho organismo ante el filipino Pacquiao.

“Espera y verás”, se limitó a decir Valcárcel cuando se le preguntó sobre cuáles son las consecuencias del acuerdo que firmó Cotto para que su cetro no esté en juego.

“Van a ver la luz al final del camino. Lo único que puedo decir es que hay que asumir que la pelea será por el título”, insistió.

Sin embargo, Gabriel Peñagarícano, asesor legal del púgil criollo, dijo que “no voy a entrar en un debate con la OMB o con cualquier organismo. Hay un acuerdo entre el promotor (Bob Arum) y los peleadores”.

Cuando se le preguntó si Cotto renunciaría a su título, su asesor contestó que “no se ha contemplado” la posibilidad.

http://www.primerahora.com/diario/noticia/boxeo/accion_deportiva/roach:_vamos_a_noquear_a_cotto/317683

Some people are saying that Cotto will probably get stripped by the ****** WBO.

[WhoreUs]

who cares if it's a title fight?

it's unfortunate that pacquiao can't win a title in a 7th division though.

[JM1]

No is not going to be a title fight.

Here is WBO president talking about the situation and Cotto's lawyer.

http://www.primerahora.com/diario/noticia/boxeo/accion_deportiva/roach:_vamos_a_noquear_a_cotto/317683

Some people are saying that Cotto will probably get stripped by the ****** WBO.

can you translate it for me bro? i dont speak that language

[JM1]

who cares if it's a title fight?

it's unfortunate that pacquiao can't win a title in a 7th division though.

hope its a title cause of boxing history

[Sorbetero]

cotto's lawyer is animalistic and should be fired..

[WhoreUs]

hope its a title cause of boxing history

it's alright.

that title was won in a vacant title bout against michael jennings.



no lineal prestige whatsoever.

pac can go after shane's belt. that one means something.

[MANGLER]

If it couldn't be for the belt Pac shouldn't have bothered.

[Animalistic]

can you translate it for me bro? i dont speak that language

OMB wants to cook
The president of the World Boxing Organization (OMB), Francisco "Paco" Valcarcel, said yesterday that it still is not ruled out the chance that Cotto Welter belt (147 pounds) from the body before the filipino Pacquiao.

"Wait and see," only said Valcárcel when asked about the consequences of the agreement he signed for his scepter Cotto is not at stake.

"They will see the light at the end of the road. All I can say is that we must assume that the fight will be for the title, "he insisted.

However, Gabriel Peñagarícano, legal adviser to the Criollo boxer said "I will not enter into a debate with the OMB or any other body. There is an agreement between the promoter (Bob Arum) and fighters. "

When asked if Cotto would give up his title, his counsel replied that he "has not been referred to" the possibility.

There you go.

[RisAri0]

it'd be great for history to win his 7th division belt...but would suck for the time being knowing Pac will vacate it after.