why are fighters like calzaghe who stay in one division
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yes but your statement was asking should he have fought them at supermiddle. They never fought there so I didn't understand your logic. Hopkins fought Tito at middleweight but Tito was a CHAMPION at middleweight. He fought Oscar at 156.Comment
-
Comment
-
how many fights did tito have at mw? 2 or 3 and oscar had the 1 to felix sturm, point is hopkins best wins were from smaller men so calzaghe should of fought smaller name fighters to be considered great?Comment
-
The person who made the statement suggests he could moved up OR down in weight. And Im talking pre-Calzaghe too. He wouldn't have beat Hopkins. It's debatable he would've beat Echols, he certainly wouldn't have beat the LHW contenders such as Tarver, Harding, etc. Want me to go on?Comment
-
Tito had one fight at middle where he beat the second best guy in the division inside five rounds. Would you have preferred he beat 4 more chumps?Comment
-
I dunno why he gets so much hate he was the dominant force of that division beat the 2 other belt holders even if it wasn't packed with great names.. nuff said!!
Also i wasn't around Boxing scene at the time but someone dragged up some topics about Lacy recently and **** me.. "JEFF LACY THE NEW MIKE TYSON" "jeff lacy gonna fcuk pretty boy calzaghe face up" etc topics from mainly Americans but when Joe totally owns Lacy, Lacy is now a complete bum..
I think its funny how much ppl **** on that win (mainly Americans) yet they were wanking off to him like the dude was the second coming.. at the timeComment
Comment