Originally posted by Makavelli
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pacquiao Scared of Cotto, eyes Mosley at 143
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by snootz86 View PostI hope Mosley ****s him up at 143 seriously he is my NR1 boxer!! but even im little worried about it dude has been up to 154 alot and been fighting 147 for ages now. I little bit concerned how he can make 143 without dela hoya type ownage of his body making him weak.
I think Pac's people see this too and think Mosley at 143 is an easy fight as he will be drained hard. I still hope he gets that legacy fight and whoops pac's ass at 143 tho that will really mean something!! pac was dominant over the top 140 guy.
I feel sorry for Cotto and it looks like a straight up ***** move if Pac wants to fight for WW titles fight them at that weight.. or at least near it 143 is too much! The guy basically admits they are ****ting themselves over facing Cotto tho lol.
Overall Cotto or Mosley vs Pac will be a great fight!! if they haven't been drained to much. Pac you are not Dela Hoya sure you can make some demands but this **** is getting annoying and too much. Also if they entertain the idea with a fight with Mosley and then **** him over i will be and can imagine Mosley will be pissed. Floyd/Manny will never happen at this rate they both seem ****ing hard to sort deals with.
On a side note if Cotto doesn't get Pac who do you want to see him vs next? personally i'd like to see him avenge that loss to Margaritto or go for Mayweather.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pullcounter View Post**** pac vs any WW. cancel the cotto fight and the mosley fight. cotto/mosley II is a must.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Makavelli View Postat least i wont have to worry about Cotto low-blowing his way out of trouble...shane accepts any stipulations...THAT's a real warrior
Shane-PAC...make it happen!
He's not a midget, he's no smaller than Judah or Mayweather
He was weighing 142+ as a SFW on fightnight, he can beat them at WW
Skills can beat weight advantages, theres no reason for catchweights
Comment
Comment