Would a decisive win over Pac decide whether Cotto is better than JMM?

[Doctor_Tenma]

Show me a legitimate boxing article that discusse the "frame"...And I will shut up...lol

Dude, you tried to make it seem as if Cotto and Pacquiao were the same size. Cotto has the much bigger frame. By that logic, what would be wrong with Funeka and Cotto going at it, or Cotto and Mike Tyson? Be real now, being bigger doesn't only revolve around height/ reach, "FRAME" comes into play.

[MANGLER]

No. Pac ain't a WW.

[dondi330]

Dude, you tried to make it seem as if Cotto and Pacquiao were the same size. Cotto has the much bigger frame. By that logic, what would be wrong with Funeka and Cotto going at it, or Cotto and Mike Tyson? Be real now, being bigger doesn't only revolve around height/ reach, "FRAME" comes into play.

DUDE!!!.lol.
WHen you measure up two extreme differences, of course your gonna "seem to make a point.
Funeka is 6'1" with a 72" reach..while my comparisons were all the same height and reach. Oh and did Hatton have a bigger frame than Pac?

[dondi330]

Cotto
Chest 39"
Chest expanded: 41"
Forearms: 11 1/2"
Wrist: 7 1/2 "
Thigh: 22

Pac.

Chest:38"
Chest expanded:41"
Forearms:12"
Wrist:8"
Thigh:20"
Where's this large "frame" Difference?

[dondi330]

PAC
weight: 140
reach:67"
chest:38"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:12"
waist:29"
thigh:20"
calf:15"
neck:16"
wrist:8"
fist:10"
COTTO
weight :147
reach:67"
chest:39"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:11 1/2"
waist:32"
thigh:22 1/2"
calf:12"
neck:16"
wrist:7 1/2"
fist:11"

I found this Tale of the tape even better ...wheres the huge difference?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

PAC
weight: 140
reach:67"
chest:38"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:12"
waist:29"
thigh:20"
calf:15"
neck:16"
wrist:8"
fist:10"
COTTO
weight :147
reach:67"
chest:39"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:11 1/2"
waist:32"
thigh:22 1/2"
calf:12"
neck:16"
wrist:7 1/2"
fist:11"

I found this Tale of the tape even better ...wheres the huge difference?

Pac Fight Night Weight, 148-151

Cotto fight night weight 152-158

The only difference between the 2 will be like 6-8 pounds on fight night!!!!

[dondi330]

Pac Fight Night Weight, 148-151

Cotto fight night weight 152-158

The only difference between the 2 will be like 6-8 pounds on fight night!!!!

At least I have the "frame " issue dead.
as for walking in weight ...that remains to be seen.

[AztecWanker]

PAC
weight: 140
reach:67"
chest:38"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:12"
waist:29"
thigh:20"
calf:15"
neck:16"
wrist:8"
fist:10"
COTTO
weight :147
reach:67"
chest:39"
chest expanded:41"
forearms:11 1/2"
waist:32"
thigh:22 1/2"
calf:12"
neck:16"
wrist:7 1/2"
fist:11"

I found this Tale of the tape even better ...wheres the huge difference?

lol Flawless is that you?

[Shadow boxer 3]

I mean considering that Pac, JMM, and Cotto are about 5'7". They all have a 67" reach.
JMM tested or even "won" in some eyes but it was a close decision either way.
Observers cant say "Cotto was too big" because they are all equal in height, weight, and reach.
Many believe JMM is a far more superior boxer.
So given all this if Cotto flat out whoops Pac......will he be considered a better boxer than JMM?

no. just cause fighter A beat fighter B doesnt mean fighter A can automatically beat fighter C.

Example: cotto beat mosley. then Marg beat cotto, then mosley beat marg

[dondi330]

lol Flawless is that you?

yes..Ive been discovered