Since when does having two losses mean you should retire?

[zeidrich]

cotto would not retire but he will surely get the "hatton treatment". hatton also have 2 lose but people want him to retire. Beaten by a smaller man can affect you both physically and mentally.

So basically, Cotto is favored in this fight because of his weight advantage so this advantage will also haunt cotto if he will lose the fight.

[sylvestersweet]

When that happens.

[Sorbetero]

When that happens.

pac is more deadly when hes a counter puncher.

[tesla_power]

People keep saying if Cotto loses to Pacquiao his career is over and he should retire. In a way that's a bit disrespectful to Manny, it's not as if he is some bum. Pacquiao is the man right now. So losing to Manny is an honor if it happens and its a huge deal if you beat him too.

But mainly my question is this, Cotto has only lost to Margarito who may have been cheating so how would a second win mean its time to pack it up and close up shop? He only looked bad against Clottey due to his eye being tore up.

I blame Mayweather for this once you lose or lose more than once you're a ruined fighter ideology. A lot of people really hold him in such a high regard for having his 0 still at this stage of the game but forget he is a hardcore cherry picker.

agree but i'm more concerned of PAC since no matter who he's fighting .. he is almost always the smaller fighter in this future fights ... except if he will fight jmm

[Burner]

Who said Cotto should retire???

I didnt.

But Hatton who has TWO losses by brutal KO..should retire.