Wlad/Chambers = Wlad/Byrd

[-PANDA-]

I love Eastern European men.

really?

i was afraid to say anything

[Klitschko2011]

so its one down two to go?

good point

Chambers is a dead man

Anybody with at least 2 brain cells knows that Wlad will destroy Chambers.

[AKATheMack]

listen to this kid. read on.
amazing...all these wlad and dimi fans are going thru and deleting all there one sided posts on the chambers fight.
ha ha ha...
here's a real winner here. he goes under many alts. all have wlad or vitali avatars. i had replied using his quote so i had it saved. he deleted it out of that thread. ha ha
this guy is a crack up:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Klitschko2009 http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/.....s/viewpost.gif you dumb **** Eastern European heavyweights are superior and are dominating the heavyweight division...All of the top American heavyweights have been defeated by superior Eastern European heavyweights. You Americans have gone soft...Eastern Europeans are stronger, hungrier and more determined. Here's some advice you twat....ALWAYS bet on the Eastern European Dimitrenko will beat the **** out of Chambers

[/quote-steelhead]if i had a **** i'd be playing with myself right now panzyboy!

[/QUOTE]


To be fair Klitschko2009 is a bag of **** though. Wlad will beat the holy hell out of Chambers though, I dont see what Chambers has that other wlad victims didnt.

[MANGLER]

Chambers would put up more of a fight than Byrd did, even tho he ain't as good a boxer as Byrd. But Wlad will still beat him.

[Hupladupla]

Eddie Chambers is really elusive. That could spell trouble for anybody. He has ways of making you miss while he's in front of you and as far as I am concerned, the only reason he lost the Povetkin fight, was because he stopped throwing punches. Good win for Eddie. One of the Klitchkos will lose soon, whether is it Arreolla, Haye or Eddie. Wlad is will beat will beat Pov, but one of these guys is going to pull off the upset.

[Stickman]

Eddie Chambers is really elusive. That could spell trouble for anybody. He has ways of making you miss while he's in front of you and as far as I am concerned, the only reason he lost the Povetkin fight, was because he stopped throwing punches. Good win for Eddie. One of the Klitchkos will lose soon, whether is it Arreolla, Haye or Eddie. Wlad is will beat will beat Pov, but one of these guys is going to pull off the upset.

None of the three are capable of upsetting either Klitschko at this time. Not to say they can't make some changes and have a reasonable chance (Haye, at least, not so sure about the other two), but right now, from everything I've seen of any of the three you mention, none of them have more than an extremely remote, "puncher" chance at beating a Klitschko brother. And if Haye were to come into the ring against either without making alot of changes to his style and approach, he gets stopped late just like every other upset-minded challenger the last few years.

[#1Assassin]

Chambers will be an even easier fight than Byrd because he is orthodox, has low workrate, no head movement and just stands in front of you, he's an easier target for Wlad.

Byrd was a slick southpaw defensive master with great head movement, good footwork and he had a higher workrate than Chambers. Byrd got completely dominated and destroyed twice by Wlad.

Wlad will dominate and destroy Chambers

thats just untrue. i agree chambers is similar to byrd, and i agree wlad would beat him. but saying chambers has no head movement is a lie.

[Derranged]

Byrd had good defense in their first fight. Not in the second one.

[Stickman]

thats just untrue. i agree chambers is similar to byrd, and i agree wlad would beat him. but saying chambers has no head movement is a lie.

Yep, Chambers is very elusive, difficult to put leather on clean, no matter who he's standing in front of. About the only thing you can catch him with easy is a jab, which is why he'll get beaten ****** by either Klitschko. That said, these two brothers are among the few boxers in the business who know the importance of a good jab that's used as often as possible, and employ that knowledge in every fight. If either brother were somehow limited to maybe a dozen jabs per round, they'd be taken apart by maybe half of their opponents. Many may consider them "boring" or "chicken****" for using a jab the way they do, but any trainer who's worth a **** does his best to get his fighters to do precisely what these two boys do....jab the ****ing dog**** out of anyone in front of them, and use their power hand only when it's a sure thing. Historically, and apart from one-punch KO's and other anomalies, whatever fighter throws the best jab and throws it the most often, will win the fight.

[Stickman]

Byrd had good defense in their first fight. Not in the second one.

Yep, he changed his style, tried to be more of a slugger, and that don't work for guys his size in the heavyweight division. Byrd has decent power, but I don't care what he lands on a Klitschko, he ain't going to KO either of them. I hated to watch that second Wlad/Byrd fight, I always liked Byrd, hard watching him get beat the **** up like that.