Manny Pacquiao WILL Beat Miguel Cotto!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fcastro1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 3770
    • 89
    • 7
    • 10,064

    #41
    Originally posted by Animalistic
    Dude Cotto is boxer-puncher. Pacquiao is a brawler and he can't outbox Cotto. Cotto just have better boxing skills dude.
    you are talking of the pac of 4 years back. pac is a boxer puncher. he is more complete than cotto. cotto cant fight on the back foot better than pac. just look at there last few fights.

    Comment

    • Animalistic
      Banned
      • May 2009
      • 2201
      • 125
      • 37
      • 2,409

      #42
      Originally posted by fcastro1
      you are talking of the pac of 4 years back. pac is a boxer puncher. he is more complete than cotto. cotto cant fight on the back foot better than pac. just look at there last few fights.
      What I saw in last two fights of Pacquiao was not a boxer-puncher it was a brawler so you need get your boxing IQ straight son.

      Comment

      • fcastro1
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 3770
        • 89
        • 7
        • 10,064

        #43
        Originally posted by Animalistic
        What I saw in last two fights of Pacquiao was not a boxer-puncher it was a brawler so you need get your boxing IQ straight son.
        are you telling me he wasnt boxing delahoya or diaz. he wasnt getting hit and using lateral movement and headmovement and was untouched. cotto cant do that.

        why is pac p4p1 and not cotto if he is a better boxer?

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #44
          Originally posted by Animalistic
          No he is not. Cotto has more boxing skills than Pacquiao. The only thing Pacquiao has over Cotto is hand speed.
          nah, pac better skills than cotto.

          the only think cotto has on pac is size, weight, strength and power.

          also, cotto is a quitter.

          Originally posted by Animalistic
          Pacquiao dosen't have the amateur background Cotto has and he dosen't have the versatility Cotto has either. Cotto can fight southpawl or orthodox. Cotto can brawl or box. Cotto can fight going foward or he can fight going back.

          In term of overral skills Cotto has edge over Pacquiao.
          pac is p4p #1 and cotto is in the bottom 4 p4p for a reason!!!!

          Comment

          • Pullcounter
            no guts no glory
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 42582
            • 549
            • 191
            • 49,739

            #45
            Originally posted by Animalistic
            What I saw in last two fights of Pacquiao was not a boxer-puncher it was a brawler so you need get your boxing IQ straight son.
            pac was outspeeding and outboxing dlh, not brawling.

            pac was outspeeding and out-timing hatton, not brawling.

            you probably think pac is still a one-handed fighter.

            Comment

            • 787_PR
              Banned
              • Jun 2009
              • 375
              • 9
              • 0
              • 445

              #46
              Originally posted by Pullcounter
              nah, pac better skills than cotto.

              the only think cotto has on pac is size, weight, strength and power.

              also, cotto is a quitter.



              pac is p4p #1 and cotto is in the bottom 4 p4p for a reason!!!!
              cotto is a quitter lol and pullcounter is a **** sucker

              Comment

              • Animalistic
                Banned
                • May 2009
                • 2201
                • 125
                • 37
                • 2,409

                #47
                Originally posted by fcastro1
                are you telling me he wasnt boxing delahoya or diaz. he wasnt getting hit and using lateral movement and headmovement and was untouched. cotto cant do that.

                why is pac p4p1 and not cotto if he is a better boxer?

                De La Hoya was dead in that fight so is not that impressing what he did against a weight ddrained past prime De La Hoya.

                Why Pacquiao is P4P king? Well Pacquiao is P4P king because Cotto lost vs Margacheato. If Cotto had won that fight Paquiao would not be P4P king It would be Cotto.

                Cotto is a better boxer.

                Comment

                • Animalistic
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 2201
                  • 125
                  • 37
                  • 2,409

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Pullcounter
                  pac was outspeeding and outboxing dlh, not brawling.

                  pac was outspeeding and out-timing hatton, not brawling.

                  you probably think pac is still a one-handed fighter.
                  Pacquiao is great but he dosen't have the boxing skills Cotto has dude.

                  Comment

                  • fcastro1
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 3770
                    • 89
                    • 7
                    • 10,064

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Animalistic
                    De La Hoya was dead in that fight so is not that impressing what he did against a weight ddrained past prime De La Hoya.

                    Why Pacquiao is P4P king? Well Pacquiao is P4P king because Cotto lost vs Margacheato. If Cotto had won that fight Paquiao would not be P4P king It would be Cotto.

                    Cotto is a better boxer.

                    i cant take you seriously after that comment. cotto wouldn't have been p4p1 if he beat margarito. pac was number 2 behind floyd for a while and i dont see how beating margarito would change that.

                    delahoya may have been drained but pac still had to beat him and he put on a clinic against an alite fighter like he did to barrera to. tell me when has cotto put a clinic against an elite? never. his fights are all close and tough.

                    pac is an overall better boxer he has shown this throught his career and why he is p4p 1.

                    Comment

                    • Animalistic
                      Banned
                      • May 2009
                      • 2201
                      • 125
                      • 37
                      • 2,409

                      #50
                      Originally posted by fcastro1
                      i cant take you seriously after that comment. cotto wouldn't have been p4p1 if he beat margarito. pac was number 2 behind floyd for a while and i dont see how beating margarito would change that.

                      delahoya may have been drained but pac still had to beat him and he put on a clinic against an alite fighter like he did to barrera to. tell me when has cotto put a clinic against an elite? never. his fights are all close and tough.

                      pac is an overall better boxer he has shown this throught his career and why he is p4p 1.
                      Go back to the news before the Cotto vs Margarito fight. After Floyd retired all the attention turn to Cotto and the talk was that if Cotto beat Margarito he would be consider to be P4P king by many and then he would face De La Hoya late in the year. Just go and check news and videos from that time and come back to me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP