No he is not. Cotto has more boxing skills than Pacquiao. The only thing Pacquiao has over Cotto is hand speed.
believe what you like. pac has better footwork, better headmovement, he has better lateral movement, has better stamina. p4p1 he is a better fighter. resumes and accomplishments dont lie.
believe what you like. pac has better footwork, better headmovement, he has better lateral movement, has better stamina. p4p1 he is a better fighter. resumes and accomplishments dont lie.
Pacquiao dosen't have the amateur background Cotto has and he dosen't have the versatility Cotto has either. Cotto can fight southpawl or orthodox. Cotto can brawl or box. Cotto can fight going foward or he can fight going back.
In term of overral skills Cotto has edge over Pacquiao.
Pacquiao dosen't have the amateur background Cotto has and he dosen't have the versatility Cotto has either. Cotto can fight southpawl or orthodox. Cotto can brawl or box. Cotto can fight going foward or he can fight going back.
In term of overral skills Cotto has edge over Pacquiao.
pac is a better boxer than cotto. if they were in thesame division pac would obliterate him. amateur doesn't mean anything in the pros. pac has improved and is a more versitile fighter than cotto. cotto is strong but p4p pac is a better fighter.
pac is a better boxer than cotto. if they were in thesame division pac would obliterate him. amateur doesn't mean anything in the pros. pac has improved and is a more versitile fighter than cotto. cotto is strong but p4p pac is a better fighter.
Dude Cotto is boxer-puncher. Pacquiao is a brawler and he can't outbox Cotto. Cotto just have better boxing skills dude.
Cotto boxing skills are better than Pacquiao and don't come trying to debate this because you will make an ass of yourself.
if he was such a great boxer he wouldn't of let a slow plodding brawler like margarito bust him up. i would never envisage a margarito type fighter in any of pacs division beat him up. pac would just be to fast and smart.
Tweet
Comment