7 Reasons Why Pacquiao Wins the Cotto Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tyson
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2003
    • 5344
    • 317
    • 435
    • 13,084

    #121
    Originally posted by Fights
    I have watch some of Cotto's old fights and I must say that Pacquiao can beat him. Here are the reasons:

    1. Cotto is a converted southpaw - Pacquiao's last three fights were: southpaw (Diaz), converted southpaw (Oscar), and pseudo-southpaw (left hand dominant Hatton). Manny Pacquiao who is born ambidextrous (adept in using both hands in his day-to-day activities), seems to be stronger when fighting left hand dominant fighters.
    Pac is stronger against left hand dominant fighters because the right hand is the most effective punch against a southpaw. After that, the left hook to the liver.
    I'll agree that if Pacman had been a right hander, I would never have considered him able to beat Cotto.

    2. Cotto is not a predominantly counter-puncher - The only way to beat Pacquiao is to counter him. Even that can sometimes backfires, as Pacquiao has improved dramatically, countering even the counterpuncher Marquez. Cotto doesn't have the counterpunching speed, reflex, hand-eye coordination and superb timing of Marquez.
    You are doing two things wrong here; you are lying and assuming that your perception and pre-conception is accurate.

    There are several ways to beat any fighter, including Pac. One is to cut off the ring and stay in his face throwing shorter punches than he is. I expect that to be the gameplan of Cotto, but not really sure as Cotto's very versatile.

    De la Hoya tried to be a counter-puncher against Pacquiao, unfortunately Oscar's physicality is of subpar standard and what makes it worst he's left-hand dominant. What's more Pacquiao can now fight backwards.
    Using a washed up De La Hoya as a measuring stick doesn't fly in the real world.

    3. Cotto gets tired - Cotto has a habit of tapering off after the mid-rounds. Pacquiao has a reputation of having freakish stamina reservoir. Manny is a throwback to an era where rounds are more than a dozen.
    Cotto gets tired because he uses strength and power to break down his opponents in the early- early mid-rounds. He changes the pace at times to avoid falling into a repetetive pattern and because he's juicing up again to finish a fighter late.

    What you don't point out here is the fact that Cotto is spending an awful lot of energy taking the gas out of the opponent, so your point isn't really a point.

    De la Hoya would fit into your reasoning.

    4. Cotto is much slower than Pacquiao - Speed is an inborn gift. You can't teach speed. You either have it or you don't.

    Don't expect Pacquiao's speed to diminish due to weight. Remember that since 2004, Pacquiao is used to entering the ring as essentially a welterweight (146 lbs. during his 1st Marquez fight).
    He isn't much slower, although he is in fact not as fast as Pac. What he does possess is timing and beautiful short punches, which will overcome speed is used properly.

    This is what makes this fight very hard to predict.

    5. Cotto is not physically big - Pac and Cotto has almost the same height and have an identical reach. Sure, Cotto is bulkier, but you have to remember that Pacquiao spars with middleweights, some of which he knocked down.
    He will be fighting a middleweight come fight night; without the 16 oz gloves.
    A middleweight that has studied Pac for several months and devoted his life to beat him. There's a difference there.

    6. Cotto turtles - When on the defensive, Cotto enters the turtle mode. Pacquiao has long added to his offensive arsenal fake jabs, up and down feints, with 3 or 4 punch fast combos from different angles. Manny smart fast footwork also ensure of him having high percentage of accurate punches landing when faced with turtle defense (see Diaz, De la Hoya and Hatton).
    This is correct; when pressed hard or resting, Cotto is in turtle mode indeed.

    But Cotto is a far better counter puncher than either of the three above mentioned fighters.
    7. Cotto's feet are usually planted - Pacquiao moves in and out, side to side, throwing trajectory angle power punches while moving at an unpredictable direction at an uncanny speed. Cotto's feet moves when he's on the defensive and when his arms are tired.
    Which makes him the tank he is. It's also what makes his punches heavy and damaging.

    But if you look at some of Cotto's earlier fights, you'll see he has excellent footwork when he needs to. He really is a very well balanced fighter with no real flaw, which makes it possible for him to rely on other things if one aspect of his game doesn't work.

    Comment

    • jazluvr
      I'm a voodoo chile
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 281831
      • 3,395
      • 5,059
      • 720

      #122
      Originally posted by S a m u r a i
      People need to dead this "timing kills speed" bull****. You guys only picked up on it since Mayweather Sr. said it on 24-7. I never saw this being said on here before Floyd Sr. said it.

      Come on guys, don't be acting like a bunch of parrots who can't think for themselves.

      You cannot time what you can't see coming. Especially when the fighter you are trying to time has such a syncopated rhythm. Pacquiao does not have a normal, predictable rhythm. Being a drummer, I can see this very clearly. It's the same with Joe Calzaghe. His unpredictability and offbeat rhythm (this is why some compare his style to freeform jazz) were some of the reasons why he kept on winning. Pacquiao is similar in several ways to Calzaghe. Both southpaw, and both syncopated as ****. It's hard to beat such a style.

      The opposite of these guys is someone like Hatton who has a regular rhythm and fights at one consistent pace. It's the boxing equivalent of a boring 4/4 timing -- you know exactly when and where the beats will fall, every time.
      Did i hear somone mention me?
      Pac vs Cotto=anything can happen

      Comment

      • We want Floyd
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 2841
        • 89
        • 0
        • 3,552

        #123
        Originally posted by Luis12
        great post...

        3 reasons why Cotto is going to win:

        -Powerful Jab
        -Left hook to the body
        -Shane Mosley...way faster and powerful than pac

        thanks...
        The Shane that fought Cotto is not faster than PAC. But Shane is definitely the bigger puncher!

        I'll tell ya what scares me about Cotto outside of his punching power and size. It's his f**kin' chin, Mosley hit him with some clean hard shots, this is Shane we're talkin' about! And Cotto just kept on truckin'!

        I'll tell ya what though, Shane I believe fought the wrong gameplan against Cotto. Shane probably thought that his sheer punching power would be good enough(I wonder if Shane felt he needed a ko fighting in MSG). But, Shane for the most part chose to stand in front of the Puerto Rican truck and was focused more on landing bombs, rather than focusing on combination punching, lateral movement and being busier with the jab.

        Instead, he just tried to land one-big shot at a time.Having said all that, I have Cotto winnin' against PAC.

        Comment

        • Zuma
          Banned
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 243
          • 17
          • 2
          • 347

          #124
          When you're right, you're right.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP