What do you think of the WBO belt?

[Hagler★]

Some very good summaries in here! green k given

[True Guru]

the WBA is a joke just look at the heavyweight title!!
Its a 4 man division outta Ruiz,Valuev,Holyfield and Chagaev,
All the alphabets titles are crap

[joe strong]

not a world title in my eyes.it's a fringe belt much like the eu belt & nabf,wbu,etc.herbie hide,fransico damiani...need I say more?

[Deja_Vous]

In boxing today it seems like every week there are some new bull**** organizations making cracker jack belts for fighters to win. I think it should still be limited to the WBA, WBC, and IBF belts but now the WBO has been around for a while and some people seem to call it a major belt. I think technically you only need to hold the first three and Ring belt to be considered the undisputed champion of the division.

I for one really dont care much about the WBO belt. I know Cotto holds that belt and if Pac fights him and wins he would techincally be considered a champ at weltweight for winning that belt, where as if he won the IBC belt he would not be a legitimate champ . Belts like the IBO, IBA, IBC and whatever else dont mean **** and do not make you a champ and I kind of think the WBO should be with them rather than up there with the main 3. I'm not saying that boxers that hold those belts are not champs but I really think the WBA WBC and IBF should stay the main three. What do you guys think?

the WBA is a joke just look at the heavyweight title!!
Its a 4 man division outta Ruiz,Valuev,Holyfield and Chagaev,
All the alphabets titles are crap

The WBO is the biggest joke of all.

As fans we should reject this spurious bush-league orginization....regardless what the commentators and promoters say.

[Deja_Vous]

not a world title in my eyes.it's a fringe belt much like the eu belt & nabf,wbu,etc.herbie hide,fransico damiani...need I say more?

Thank you..