Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is more Boring to Watch? Mayweather of Wlad Klitschko?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    floyd even at WW is better to watch, hes defensive because he fights alot of bigger guys mostly, his movement and technique is good to watch and in his days at 130 he was actually fairly exciting

    wlad is just boring as hell

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Spacey1991 View Post
      What he is saying is winning is winning, you go out there to win the fight don't you? Cause I am pretty sure you don't go out there to lose... how many "boring" Floyd fights have you seen?
      on Wlads level of boring, 2 (Oscar and Baldomir, although i didnt watch the end of the baldomir fight)

      Of course u go out to win, the guys i mentioned all go out to win. It's the heart, determination and willingness to slug it out and force a win that makes them exciting in the first place. Different styles are more appealing than others on the eye.

      its a thread about who's more boring, Wlad or PBF. I'm saying u dont HAVE to win to be entertaining

      Comment


      • #23
        I don't think either fighter is boring, as I'm a huge fan of both guys. If I had to name one, I'd have to say Floyd though, since Wlad can end fights with one punch.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Jim Jeffries View Post
          So Wlad has very limited skills? How is it that he dominates any guy he fights his size? (Austin, McCline, Thompson, etc)

          Since when is holding and headbutting a skill?
          1. hopkins is an old man at 45, wlad is 10-12 years younger but still wont have the same guts.

          2. wlad is big and uses his height vs shorter fat men with no shape

          3. wlad is a heavyweight, hops is a middleweight, there is a difference jackass, i dont see how your making comparisons of a HW vs middleweight

          4. lol at u listing bums to validate wlad fighting guys his size

          5. wladimir is the more boring out of the two and his last 5 or 6 fights have put most to sleep

          Comment


          • #25
            wlad is more boring by a mile,hard to compare due to the different weightclasses but its clear to see floyd isnt the same above 140 lbs excitement wise.u dont see many klitscko ko's on the highlight reels anyway

            Comment


            • #26
              i've never been bored watching either of them fight.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by gingeralbino View Post
                on Wlads level of boring, 2 (Oscar and Baldomir, although i didnt watch the end of the baldomir fight)

                Of course u go out to win, the guys i mentioned all go out to win. It's the heart, determination and willingness to slug it out and force a win that makes them exciting in the first place. Different styles are more appealing than others on the eye.

                its a thread about who's more boring, Wlad or PBF. I'm saying u dont HAVE to win to be entertaining
                I respect what your saying there... but at the end of the day a wins a win. How can you say PBF is boring when you have only seen him in 2 fights that could be considered boring?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
                  1. hopkins is an old man at 45, wlad is 10-12 years younger but still wont have the same guts.

                  2. wlad is big and uses his height vs shorter fat men with no shape

                  3. wlad is a heavyweight, hops is a middleweight, there is a difference jackass, i dont see how your making comparisons of a HW vs middleweight

                  4. lol at u listing bums to validate wlad fighting guys his size

                  5. wladimir is the more boring out of the two and his last 5 or 6 fights have put most to sleep

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Spacey1991 View Post
                    What he is saying is winning is winning, you go out there to win the fight don't you? Cause I am pretty sure you don't go out there to lose... how many "boring" Floyd fights have you seen?
                    Yeah but what he is trying to say is that Gatti is way more popular than Floyd and he has losses cause he went out on his shield

                    We know that is not Floyds style but the question is who is more boring
                    I am a floyd hater but after Saturday I have to say Wlad is super boring
                    I cant stand a big man to throw only 2 punches
                    a left Jab and straight right
                    throw a combo or at least an uppercut or a hook
                    mix it up

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by larrysmith View Post
                      both win,rarely get hit and are/were champs..so who gives a damn about being boring..they get the job done at the highest level..want excitement go watch a toughman contest
                      So you are saying you know he is boring but he wins so its okay.

                      That makes you sound like a glory hunter who only likes him because he wins.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP