Who is more Boring to Watch? Mayweather of Wlad Klitschko?

[JACK D. RIPPER]

be serious about his. i dont wanne read no vinnie paz ****

I voted for Floyd. At least Wladdy knocks people out. Even though it takes him way longer than it should.

[ИATAS]

Yet you're a Hopkins fan?

Skill vs very limited skills but big. You decide.

[karrapato]

My vote was for WK based on opposition level.

WK has all the advantages against his opponents and don't use them.

[Owlzfan84]

Mayweather wasnt always boring. With Wlad its pretty much been the same his entire career. At superfeather and lightweight Mayweather was a pretty damn good fighter to watch. He actually took chances, stayed in the center of the ring, fought on the inside more, and actually engaged in the action first a lot of times.

[TredKiller]

damn i accedentally picked floyd, ****,
Wlad is more boreing, o yea and......

VINNIE PAZIENZA

[Abstraction]

Yet you're a Hopkins fan?

Wlad's not a 44 year old man.

[Spacey1991]

both win,rarely get hit and are/were champs..so who gives a damn about being boring..they get the job done at the highest level..want excitement go watch a toughman contest

excitment doesnt always equal intelegance...remember that..as a pro you are only concerned with winning..cause who wants to watch an exciting loser???

Couldn't agree more, if I had to pick one I would choose Wlad Klitschko... which I did... but your right, both beat who is put in front of them and win the fight, exciting doesn't have to be toe to toe wars all of the time its Boxing with tactics... I like watching Floyd fight because I like how he manages to slip and block punches so well... exciting doesn't necessarily have to be toe to toe it is whether you find it appealing or not and I enjoy watching Floyd, and so do Klit fans like watching Wlad... no harm in that.

At the end of the day, winning is winning... both get the job done.

[gingeralbino]

excitment doesnt always equal intelegance...remember that..as a pro you are only concerned with winning..cause who wants to watch an exciting loser???

**** loads of people!!!! WTF are you on about? Gatti, Ward, Agustus etc. have **** loads of fans; for good reason. They entertain. They win some, lose some, always put on a great show.

Wlad is more boring by the way. Just.

[Spacey1991]

**** loads of people!!!! WTF are you on about? Gatti, Ward, Agustus etc. have **** loads of fans; for good reason. They entertain. They win some, lose some, always put on a great show.

Wlad is more boring by the way. Just.

What he is saying is winning is winning, you go out there to win the fight don't you? Cause I am pretty sure you don't go out there to lose... how many "boring" Floyd fights have you seen?

[Jim Jeffries]

Skill vs very limited skills but big. You decide.

So Wlad has very limited skills? How is it that he dominates any guy he fights his size? (Austin, McCline, Thompson, etc)

Since when is holding and headbutting a skill?