Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will Wladimir Klitschko break Joe Lous' 25 title defenses record?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by LEFTYGUNZZ View Post
    He is NOT the true Champion I don't care what any one says. As long as his brother came back and took Peter's title and Peter out of th epicture for him his brother has more claim to the Tue Champ title then he does. I don;t care how many alphabet titles he holds and how many times he defended them.

    he is 33 years old he is not in his prime You prime years in boxing are usually from 25-30 that is pretty much in every sport. Even if he fights for 3 more years and fights 3 or 4 times a yearit would be only 12 title defenses. He just got the ring belt and was crowned HW Champion as far as the public is cincered so 12 is only half of 25. i don;t care how many times he defended the IBO, WBO, IBF or any othe alphbet belt for that matter.....Lefty
    what a joke of a post. your basing boxers primes soley on age? duh

    Comment


    • #72
      LOL to not reading properly. Again, the answer was to the question there were no household names on Holmes record. Mercer weasn't in the Holmes era but he beat him, no?

      Comment


      • #73
        As opposed to solely on weight?

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by FreshPrince View Post
          What do you think? Obviously two different cases here. Joe Louis was THE champion for all of his defenses while Wlad hasn't even gotten all the belts yet. But counting the main 4 belts, (correct me if I'm wrong) he has defended at least one of them 12 times. He's almost halfway there and just entering the prime of his career.

          If he gets by Haye, I see him dominating easily for the next 3 years. That's when the next batch of prospects will be coming through (Fury, Wilder, ect.).

          Keep in mind, other than waiting 6 months for Haye in 2009, Wlad fights 3-4 times a year.
          1) Louis defended 25 in a row...that's the record. Klit is currently at 7

          2) Louis was THE champ, something Klit only sort of just became. His current number is zero.

          No, he will not break ish.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by crold1 View Post
            1) Louis defended 25 in a row...that's the record.
            Of these 26 world title wins 16 were against cruisers (like Davis 190 lbs, 5-21) or even sub-cruisers (Conn, 174 lbs).

            If you check his 200+ world title wins then Joe Louis won only THREE times in a row (Nova, Baer, Simon).

            Comment


            • #76
              wlad has only just established lineage so hes got a long way to go, because in my eyes he will need to win 25 times starting now... just my opinion though

              Comment


              • #77
                Simply no. The fact that he just won the heavyweight title in his last fight, I seriously doubt he has 25 fights left.

                Comment


                • #78
                  the thing is JOE LOUIS was THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION. Wladimir is A HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION. There are 2 more, Vitali and Nikolai.

                  Also, who has Wladimir defended his titles against and in what manner? Who has Joe Louis defended his title against and in what manner?

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Chris Byrd claimed he came in at well under 200 lbs for the Wladimir Klitschko fight. I guess Wlad's best win shouldn't count then.

                    Wladimir won't break Louis' record, I doubt anyone will.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by TheGreatA View Post
                      Chris Byrd claimed he came in at well under 200 lbs for the Wladimir Klitschko fight. I guess Wlad's best win shouldn't count then.
                      Wladimir won't break Louis' record, I doubt anyone will.
                      If they will make a superheavyweight division 215+ or so, then the win over Chris Byrd will not count for that division.

                      Moreover if Byrd claims that he was under 200 (and we know what a one-sided bashing he received) then this shows you what a crap the 70ies were.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP