So the numbers did have something to do with Floyd?
I am confused now, cause you just said they didn't... they either did or didn't.
If Oscar has never done 2.4 million buys without Mayweather, then how does it have nothing to do with Mayweather?
The guy fought Tito, Mosley, Hopkins, etc. and they didn't do that many buys, so if it is the case it has nothing to do with Floyd... where have the other numbers magically appeared from?
Mayweather vs Hatton did 900k+ buys and I hear it did around a million or more in the UK (don't quote me on the UK part).
So, your saying... because Floyd has never done 2.4 million buys without Oscar it was all Oscar, and because Oscar has never done 2.4 million buys without Mayweather Floyd still had nothing to do with it and it was all Oscar?
Lets face it, the buys did have something to do with Floyd on his part, I aint saying Floyd did it all... of course Oscar and Hatton had a lot to do with it too... but you can't say those buys had nothing to do with Floyd, thats just ******.
I am confused now, cause you just said they didn't... they either did or didn't.
If Oscar has never done 2.4 million buys without Mayweather, then how does it have nothing to do with Mayweather?
The guy fought Tito, Mosley, Hopkins, etc. and they didn't do that many buys, so if it is the case it has nothing to do with Floyd... where have the other numbers magically appeared from?
Mayweather vs Hatton did 900k+ buys and I hear it did around a million or more in the UK (don't quote me on the UK part).
So, your saying... because Floyd has never done 2.4 million buys without Oscar it was all Oscar, and because Oscar has never done 2.4 million buys without Mayweather Floyd still had nothing to do with it and it was all Oscar?
Lets face it, the buys did have something to do with Floyd on his part, I aint saying Floyd did it all... of course Oscar and Hatton had a lot to do with it too... but you can't say those buys had nothing to do with Floyd, thats just ******.
Comment