Prime Tyson vs prime Vitali

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iron_boy
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 193
    • 8
    • 0
    • 6,365

    #41
    tyson by absolute MURDER!

    Comment

    • them_apples
      Lord
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 9924
      • 1,216
      • 905
      • 41,722

      #42
      Originally posted by knn
      Yes, he was all of these things. And his average fighting weight was 173lbs.
      Michael spinks walked around at over 200 lbs during his LHW career. I read that in one of the sports illustrated issues. The man had decent success at HW to, so that LHW garbage is of no avail.

      funny you should say that to, because a CW named Chris Byrd beat Vitali. On top of that Michael Spinks would have wooped Byrd.

      Comment

      • knn
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 849
        • 59
        • 16
        • 964

        #43
        Originally posted by them_apples
        Michael spinks walked around at over 200 lbs during his LHW career. I read that in one of the sports illustrated issues. The man had decent success at HW to, so that LHW garbage is of no avail.

        funny you should say that to, because a CW named Chris Byrd beat Vitali. On top of that Michael Spinks would have wooped Byrd.
        You see, this is the difference: I post FACTS while others post their favorite fantasy.

        Michael Spinks' average fight weight: 173 lbs (ranging from 165 to 212)
        Chris Byrd's average fight weight: 213 lbs

        In other words: Byrd is 40lbs HEAVIER than Spinks. Spinks HEAVIEST weight is lighter than Byrd's MEDIAN weight.

        Average weight of their KO victims:
        Byrd KOed a median opponent of 230lbs.
        Spinks KOed a median opponent of 174lbs.

        In other words: Byrd KOed opponents 56lbs HEAVIER than Spinks. In fact Byrd's LIGHTEST opponent he ever KOed is heavier than Spink's MEDIAN KO opponent.

        Wins in world heavyweight titles:
        Byrd: 5
        Spinks: 3

        KOwins against 200+ lbs opponents:
        Spinks: 2 (TWO!)
        Byrd: 19

        Spinks won only against 3 (THREE!) opponents at heavyweight: Against Cooney, against 36-year-old Larry Holmes (UD15, SD15) and against nobody Tangstad.

        A win over Byrd is worth WAY MORE than over Spinks. Probably a win over Byrd is worth 10 times more due to the better performance+ accomplishments+ record of Byrd. Don't even compare Byrd to Spinks. Spinks is 2 leagues lower than Byrd.

        Comment

        • mECHsLAVE
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 1419
          • 137
          • 105
          • 7,736

          #44
          I love Tyson, but it would be hard to see him beating Vitali. We've still never really seen Vitali in serious trouble or behind on the cards. It would be a tough fight. Tyson with Rooney may have been able to plan enough inside body work to slow Vitali down and punish him. But, honestly, probably not. Vitali probably wins.

          And skimming over the posts...

          Byrd did not beat Vitali, he just happened to be in the same ring with him when he tore his rotator. Byrd lost almost every single round of the fight.

          A prime DLH of COURSE beats a prime Mayweather. I mean, look what a well-past-it DLH was able to do against him. Made it razor close. For those who just started watching DLH in recent years, go back and watch his fights pre-Mosely. The difference in his pop and speed in his prime vs. say after the Mosely rematch is remarkable. Mayweather would be in real trouble. Mayweather does not want to fight anyone bigger and stronger than himself, that was the exception because DLH was past-it, and DLH still nearly won. Margarito, Williams, etc and Mayweather runs for the hills. Little guys trying to move up to welter tho? Oh, Floyd's all over that. LOL

          Comment

          • Bigdaddy_Vh
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Aug 2006
            • 662
            • 17
            • 0
            • 8,340

            #45
            im a self-proclaimed "biggest tyson fan" but we have to look at reality here...i dont care who you are, if you are 5'10 it is an AWFUL lot to ask of you to defeat a man that stands 6'7. the height and reach disadvantages would be ridiculous. I could possibly see a case for Mike winning by close UD or SD if he trained to move for 12 rounds but i feel like once Mike saw he couldnt knock vitali out his moral resolve would begin to crumble and vitali would eventually stop him late. Even mike admitted after the lewis fight(yeah, he was past his prime but so was lewis) that lewis was simply too big for him.

            Comment

            • knn
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 849
              • 59
              • 16
              • 964

              #46
              Originally posted by Bigdaddy_Vh
              im a self-proclaimed "biggest tyson fan" but we have to look at reality here...i dont care who you are, if you are 5'10 it is an AWFUL lot to ask of you to defeat a man that stands 6'7.

              Vitali is taller than Wlad, Tyson is smaller than Oscar de la Hoya.

              Tyson would be Vitalis Klitschko's SMALLEST opponent. While Vitali would be Tyson's TALLEST opponent.

              Comment

              • True Guru
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 1648
                • 138
                • 0
                • 1,845

                #47
                Mike wouldnt be able to ko Ironfist,He'd run out of gas after 5 Rds and get stopped,

                Comment

                • Exocet
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 402
                  • 29
                  • 55
                  • 6,696

                  #48
                  Originally posted by them_apples
                  funny you should say that to, because a CW named Chris Byrd beat Vitali. On top of that Michael Spinks would have wooped Byrd.

                  Not the best supporting point, considering Byrd got totally ****d by Vitali.

                  Comment

                  • Boxingwizard
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 4298
                    • 126
                    • 190
                    • 12,228

                    #49
                    Originally posted by knn
                    Tyson never fought against Leon Spinks.

                    Oh, you mean Michael Spinks (6'3'')? Spinks was a freaking Super Middleweight (fighting as low as 165lbs). His average fighting weight was 173lbs (= sub-cruiser).

                    THIS GUY YOU COMPARE TO the Klitschkos?
                    Tyson when he fought Michael Spinks was different compared to when he fought Frank Bruno or Buster Douglas. Vital Klitschko is no Buster Douglas when it comes to technical skills, the Douglas that fought Tyson whoop Klitschko's ass.
                    Last edited by Boxingwizard; 06-16-2009, 07:58 PM.

                    Comment

                    • knn
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 849
                      • 59
                      • 16
                      • 964

                      #50
                      Originally posted by darkstar777
                      the Douglas that fought Tyson whoop whip Klitschko's ass.
                      You are the first I encountered with such opinion. I never heard "Buster > Vitali" even from the biggest Klitschko haters.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP