116-111

[120]

that was a bit over the top. wasn't it?

I was watching the fight in a pro-cotto crowd and everyone put a funny face when they heard that.

114-113....115-112

no way it was more than that

[Butterball]

I tell you what bro, thank **** you've made this thread man.

Anyone would think people didn't want to discuss the fight with the lack of threads on it around here. Well done you.

[jmmfan]

116-111 in that kind of fight is where you know you have an incompetant judge that should be fired.

[black.ink]

A judge like that must have been scoring through crowd-response. 116-111 is laughable.

[120]

I tell you what bro, thank **** you've made this thread man.

Anyone would think people didn't want to discuss the fight with the lack of threads on it around here. Well done you.

thank u good sir. Taking advantage of the day here.

next up is the plaster of paris discussion

[#1Assassin]

116-111 in that kind of fight is where you know you have an incompetant judge that should be fired.

agreed. anytime a score like this comes up everyone knows the judge is eighter corrupt or ******ed. they should be docked pay and never get any assignments again. but that never happens. ppl just say "that was a bad score" and go on like nothin happened. even though ppl know the judge is incompetent they still get the call back.. BS.

[Butterball]

agreed. anytime a score like this comes up everyone knows the judge is eighter corrupt or ******ed. they should be docked pay and never get any assignments again. but that never happens. ppl just say "that was a bad score" and go on like nothin happened. even though ppl know the judge is incompetent they still get the call back.. BS.

He should be shot IMO.

[PRboxingfan]

that was a bit over the top. wasn't it?

I was watching the fight in a pro-cotto crowd and everyone put a funny face when they heard that.

114-113....115-112

no way it was more than that

I had it 115-112 due to Cotto winning the last two rounds. It was 95-94 on my card after 10 and the 11th could've gone either way but I thought Cotto's ring generalship made the difference so I gave it to him. The 12th was clear, IMHO.

But, while I don't agree with the score, that judge only gave one more round to Cotto than most people who watched the fight. You can't call a judge incompetent because he disagreed with everyone by one round.

[Sparked_1985]

I think 115-112 was fair enough.

That's what I had. Clottey bummed himself by but not working enough after round 8, he arguably still won round 9 still though. But if Clottey just kept his hands moving he would have won.

[The Surgeon]

To be fair when i watched last nite (half drunk and high) i was shocked/appauled with that score and gave it to Cotto by a point but i just rewatched and scored round by round and came away with 115-112 and i thought Cotto could have won the 9th tho i gave it to Clottey so my card woulda been the same.

On rewatching its clear Clottey dosent throw nearly enough

Heres my card

1. Cotto 10-8
2. Cotto 10-9
3. Cotto 10-9
4. Clottey 10-9
5. Clottey 10-9
6. Cotto 10-9
7. Clottey 10-9
8. Clottey 10-9
9. Clottey 10-9
10. Cotto 10-9
11. Cotto 10-9
12. Cotto 10-9