116-111

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 120
    Lords of BoxingScene
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2008
    • 6264
    • 416
    • 799
    • 13,757

    #1

    116-111

    that was a bit over the top. wasn't it?

    I was watching the fight in a pro-cotto crowd and everyone put a funny face when they heard that.

    114-113....115-112

    no way it was more than that
  • Butterball
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 1303
    • 196
    • 190
    • 4,380

    #2
    I tell you what bro, thank **** you've made this thread man.

    Anyone would think people didn't want to discuss the fight with the lack of threads on it around here. Well done you.

    Comment

    • jmmfan
      Interim Champion
      • Aug 2008
      • 724
      • 45
      • 120
      • 6,894

      #3
      116-111 in that kind of fight is where you know you have an incompetant judge that should be fired.

      Comment

      • black.ink
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 4214
        • 213
        • 165
        • 19,555

        #4
        A judge like that must have been scoring through crowd-response. 116-111 is laughable.

        Comment

        • 120
          Lords of BoxingScene
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 6264
          • 416
          • 799
          • 13,757

          #5
          Originally posted by Butterball
          I tell you what bro, thank **** you've made this thread man.

          Anyone would think people didn't want to discuss the fight with the lack of threads on it around here. Well done you.
          thank u good sir. Taking advantage of the day here.

          next up is the plaster of paris discussion

          Comment

          • #1Assassin
            Conveyor of Truth
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2008
            • 8019
            • 647
            • 264
            • 20,993

            #6
            Originally posted by jmmfan
            116-111 in that kind of fight is where you know you have an incompetant judge that should be fired.
            agreed. anytime a score like this comes up everyone knows the judge is eighter corrupt or ******ed. they should be docked pay and never get any assignments again. but that never happens. ppl just say "that was a bad score" and go on like nothin happened. even though ppl know the judge is incompetent they still get the call back.. BS.

            Comment

            • Butterball
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2008
              • 1303
              • 196
              • 190
              • 4,380

              #7
              Originally posted by #1Assassin
              agreed. anytime a score like this comes up everyone knows the judge is eighter corrupt or ******ed. they should be docked pay and never get any assignments again. but that never happens. ppl just say "that was a bad score" and go on like nothin happened. even though ppl know the judge is incompetent they still get the call back.. BS.
              He should be shot IMO.

              Comment

              • PRboxingfan
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2004
                • 2670
                • 107
                • 59
                • 8,939

                #8
                Originally posted by 120
                that was a bit over the top. wasn't it?

                I was watching the fight in a pro-cotto crowd and everyone put a funny face when they heard that.

                114-113....115-112

                no way it was more than that
                I had it 115-112 due to Cotto winning the last two rounds. It was 95-94 on my card after 10 and the 11th could've gone either way but I thought Cotto's ring generalship made the difference so I gave it to him. The 12th was clear, IMHO.

                But, while I don't agree with the score, that judge only gave one more round to Cotto than most people who watched the fight. You can't call a judge incompetent because he disagreed with everyone by one round.

                Comment

                • Sparked_1985
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 7250
                  • 226
                  • 71
                  • 14,112

                  #9
                  I think 115-112 was fair enough.

                  That's what I had. Clottey bummed himself by but not working enough after round 8, he arguably still won round 9 still though. But if Clottey just kept his hands moving he would have won.

                  Comment

                  • The Surgeon
                    Days Of Glory
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 15385
                    • 712
                    • 1,578
                    • 24,784

                    #10
                    To be fair when i watched last nite (half drunk and high) i was shocked/appauled with that score and gave it to Cotto by a point but i just rewatched and scored round by round and came away with 115-112 and i thought Cotto could have won the 9th tho i gave it to Clottey so my card woulda been the same.

                    On rewatching its clear Clottey dosent throw nearly enough

                    Heres my card

                    1. Cotto 10-8
                    2. Cotto 10-9
                    3. Cotto 10-9
                    4. Clottey 10-9
                    5. Clottey 10-9
                    6. Cotto 10-9
                    7. Clottey 10-9
                    8. Clottey 10-9
                    9. Clottey 10-9
                    10. Cotto 10-9
                    11. Cotto 10-9
                    12. Cotto 10-9

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP