tommy hearns vs paul williams?

**Little Killer** · 06-08-2009, 07:32 PM

Paul Williams would KO Hearns. Yes that right. It would be more brutal than what Hagler did.

**krispy kreme** · 06-08-2009, 07:33 PM

Hearns late KO, Williams would make a good fight though, he is far from ordinary.

**The Gully Gad** · 06-08-2009, 07:34 PM

Hearns would put some serious hurt on him....

**AKATheMack** · 06-08-2009, 07:36 PM

At what weight? I give Paul a little better chance at higher weights at 147 Hearns puts him to sleep in 2. He may last to the 6th at 160+

**#1Assassin** · 06-08-2009, 07:37 PM

hearns by KO4.

williams is a good fighter, but at this stage of his career he cant be compared to hearns. he leaves himself open too much, hes never fought a puncher nowhere near hearns' level. and even if he could take hearns' punch which i seriously doubt, hearns would outbox him fairly easily. it doesnt matter though cuz he wouldnt be able to take hearns' punch.

**joseph5620** · 06-08-2009, 07:37 PM

Originally posted by baracuda

both in their prime who wins?

147-160 UD for Hearns. Hearns was too skilled for Paul Williams, I think.

**D-MiZe** · 06-08-2009, 07:37 PM

Hearns > Williams

**-EX-** · 06-08-2009, 07:42 PM

Hearns hits 10 times harder than Paul Williams
He has also faced far better opposition

I don't understand the comparison. Hearns wasn't the best literal boxer but his power was freakish. Paul's more of a "boxer", power is good but it aint on Hearns level. Paul wouldn't put Roberto Duran on his face...

And for the fight I'd pick Hearns by TKO...

**dans** · 06-08-2009, 07:43 PM

Didn't Williams lose to Carlos Quintana?

tommy hearns vs paul williams?