Should Boxing use Catchweights? Official Poll!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DrewWoodside
    Lifestyle..Regular!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 9244
    • 317
    • 590
    • 16,453

    #31
    Originally posted by Thread Stealer
    Only if it's a case where it makes things more fair and the bigger guy wouldn't be totally drained.

    Roach wanting Mosley to go down to 142 is more of a case where Mosley would more likely to just be dead at the weight, not to try to "even things out".

    Whitaker-Chavez being at 145, for example, I don't have much of a problem with.
    Right that's what I think. As long as the catchweight is necessary and ideal for both fighter's to put on their best possible performances.

    Comment

    • DrewWoodside
      Lifestyle..Regular!
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 9244
      • 317
      • 590
      • 16,453

      #32
      Originally posted by #1Assassin
      well then we will just have to agree to disagree. and while we are pointing things out might i add NSB seems to be agreeing with me as far as catchweights are concerned .. peace

      Assassin
      Agree to disagree is always fair.. But according to the poll you have to add both "Yes" options which equals 14 yes to 13 no!

      Comment

      • Mike_Dee
        mathematical whiz kid
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 961
        • 49
        • 48
        • 7,192

        #33
        i don't give a care. i ain't getting in the ring

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP