Originally posted by deevel79
View Post
Bernhard Hopkins is one of my favorite fighters
as well, along with JMM and the Punisher and many
others. The thing that gets me about people bashing
Floyd is that, he may or may not be the best but he is
a hard worker, very dedicated and talented. The kid
has won and defended titles through 5 divisions, stayed
undefeated and out classed some good fighters and still,
just because he hasn't lost people say he hasn't fought
good fighters? Everything I read about him I can't cosign
because a lot of it doesn't make any sense, for example,
Cotto hasn't beaten any champs for titles and only won
and defended vacant ones and he's greater than Floyd?
I'm not cosigning that! Plus he wasn't ready for Floyd at
140?
Isn't that called ducking? Shane Mosley had numerous
chances to get at Floyd and opted to go for the bigger
brand like Floyd is doing now, so why is Floyd hated for
that and Mosley loved? PLUS Mosley Roided himslef up
to beat a man he beat before? Antonio Margarito? Is
a certified cheater PERIOD, who knows if he was cheating
back then? But all Cotto supporters will say he only cheated
for Cotto to give their guy a pass? My point is this, Boxers/
fighters are not perfect and sometimes they don't fight everyone
they are supposed to fight but to down play a man's achievements
because he didn't fight like 2 or 3 guys yet in one division when
he has been winning and fighting his whole career is not right to me.
I congratulate success, win or lose. The same guys
Floyds beat with ease had Cotto wobbled and almost out.
I like and respect Floyd as a boxer and business man, it's
not personal with me. I think the biggest gripe that everyone
has with him is that he hasn't lost and therefore he hasn't fought
anyone and to me that's LAME.
as well, along with JMM and the Punisher and many
others. The thing that gets me about people bashing
Floyd is that, he may or may not be the best but he is
a hard worker, very dedicated and talented. The kid
has won and defended titles through 5 divisions, stayed
undefeated and out classed some good fighters and still,
just because he hasn't lost people say he hasn't fought
good fighters? Everything I read about him I can't cosign
because a lot of it doesn't make any sense, for example,
Cotto hasn't beaten any champs for titles and only won
and defended vacant ones and he's greater than Floyd?
I'm not cosigning that! Plus he wasn't ready for Floyd at
140?
Isn't that called ducking? Shane Mosley had numerous
chances to get at Floyd and opted to go for the bigger
brand like Floyd is doing now, so why is Floyd hated for
that and Mosley loved? PLUS Mosley Roided himslef up
to beat a man he beat before? Antonio Margarito? Is
a certified cheater PERIOD, who knows if he was cheating
back then? But all Cotto supporters will say he only cheated
for Cotto to give their guy a pass? My point is this, Boxers/
fighters are not perfect and sometimes they don't fight everyone
they are supposed to fight but to down play a man's achievements
because he didn't fight like 2 or 3 guys yet in one division when
he has been winning and fighting his whole career is not right to me.
I congratulate success, win or lose. The same guys
Floyds beat with ease had Cotto wobbled and almost out.
I like and respect Floyd as a boxer and business man, it's
not personal with me. I think the biggest gripe that everyone
has with him is that he hasn't lost and therefore he hasn't fought
anyone and to me that's LAME.
Comment