If you were making millions per fight, and alot of people said you were ducking the best fighters. How bothered would you be?
If you were a boxer...
Collapse
-
-
Boxing is a (risky) business first, so I would first make as much money as possible and then I would take more risks after I was set financially (which is what most fighters tend to do anyway) until my health was at risk and/or my skills were eroding.
Some fighters are also skilled enough to be the best without being involved in wars no matter who they fight. It's usually only limited fighters that get themselves involved in wars and they usually pay a heavy price (physically) later in life for it as we've seen time and time again, so they better make sure they get paid of they'll be disabled and broke which is sadly the outcome for most...
Having a lasting legacy has changed since the internet IMO making it nearly impossible to be an All-Time great. Now no matter what a fighter does it will be discredited by haters on the boards. It seems that every elite fighter is "overrated" or a "bum" at least on the boards. Any fighter that reads the message boards would be foolish to fight trying to please the posters since that's impossible and they would just be better off fighting for their best financial interest.Comment
-
Comment
-
I say just concentrate on surviving fights. There's always gonna be collateral damage, the question is how bad is it? There are some boxers out there who get out of the game virtually unscathed and with a little money, and of course it's works the other way.
Just to be sure no one has an disillusions about being a prizefighter. Anyone can turn pro, but very few make it to the big pay days and the spotlight. Everyone has to work their way up, even Olympians. Between your pro debut and your last fight, a lot can happen. I think getting to the top is all based on: great performances, a good record, a solid fan-base, politics and connections.Comment
Comment