People need to zip it about a Pac-Mayweather fight so JMM gets a fair decision.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Iceta
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 6751
    • 111
    • 205
    • 13,490

    #11
    I brought up another thread a little bit similar to this, only I left the Pacquiao equation out of it. I have no problem with either of these guys fighting Pacquiao as long as the rightful winner of this fight has their hands raised in victory. My personal preference is a trilogy between Marquez and Pacquiao since it is already an established rivalry and Floyd doesn't bring that kind of explosion to his fights. I also may have been a little over the top when I said Bad Decision in my thread description as another poster mentioned, but I just wanted other people's opinions about who they think may get the decision if the fight happens to be close. I think JMM will stop Mayweather however.

    Comment

    • Iceta
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 6751
      • 111
      • 205
      • 13,490

      #12
      Originally posted by PRboxingfan
      What people say has no effect on how the judges see the fight or how JMM performs that night. Also, the bolded sentence makes no sense. If he beats Mayweather, there is no such thing as a bad decision (you're saying that he wins, so the judges must have given him the fight).
      That's not what I meant at all. I'm saying if he happens to do enough to deserve the decision over Mayweather and the judges take it away from him because they see an investment in Floyd. You are totally misinterpreting. And thanks for the cRed.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP