Is Cotto a ***** if he fights Pac at 144?

[larry x]

No, because pacquiao's camp wanted cotto.

jmm camp wanted floyd

[Xcusemymood]

Cotto-Pacquiao is a great fight, no ***** move.

Ok but do you call Mayweather a ***** for fighting JMM? In all honesty PBF and JMM are closer in size than Cotto and Pac.

[MANGLER]

I do understand your point.

But I just want to know if you would call him a *****?

It'd be a ***** move, but I won't flat out call any pro prizefighter a *****. That ****'s wack homey.

[Xcusemymood]

Why would anyone call him a ***** for??? Do you know he has to kill himself to make that 144???

Im not calling him a ***** at all. Im wondering how this poster could call Mayweather ***** for fighting JMM at 144 but not Cotto for fighting Pac at 144.

This is an honest question.

[DGP]

no because cotto has already fought real welters something floyd hasnt done. Thats the difference

[DGP]

if mayweather beats cotto or mosley and then wants a big money fight with pac i have no problem with that.

[larry x]

no because cotto has already fought real welters something floyd hasnt done. Thats the difference

sorry man..floyd was the lineal champ he beat the top ww baldo and the previous top ww judah..so cut that ****..and hatton alson was a previous belt holder at 147..you should know that cause thats how cotto got the wba belt cause hatton vacated the belt

[Xcusemymood]

It'd be a ***** move, but I won't flat out call any pro prizefighter a *****. That ****'s wack homey.

Couldnt agree more about calling fighters that.

[DGP]

baldo come on man lets be real about this he never fought a true threat at welter. not saying he wont beat all the top guys but he never fought them

[DGP]

hatton and judah are no comparison to margs mosley and clottey