Mayweather "pacquiao got outboxed by morales"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dde91
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 2686
    • 86
    • 20
    • 9,217

    #41
    Originally posted by The Gambler1981
    Morales is not a top 50 atg, not even close.
    Morales is an ATG no matter how you look at it. Top 50. Top 100, what ever he is, he is a ****in ATG, no questions ask.

    Comment

    • Easy-E
      Gotta want it
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 22686
      • 865
      • 1,743
      • 32,777

      #42
      Originally posted by dde91
      its funny how you consider a 28 year old man "OLD." you are clear an idiot, and Zahir beat Morales at 135, and pacquiao KNOCK HIM OUT.
      The idiot is the boxing newbie who does not understand the difference between true age and boxing age. He was way out of his prime and had 50+ fights under his belt.
      Morales was 17 when he started fighting, and 29 at the time of the fight, so yeah, 12 years of boxing and over 50 fights was old.
      Get a clue, son.

      Comment

      • The Gambler1981
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2008
        • 25961
        • 520
        • 774
        • 49,039

        #43
        Originally posted by dde91
        Morales is an ATG no matter how you look at it. Top 50. Top 100, what ever he is, he is a ****in ATG, no questions ask.
        Morales is great and in a sence he is an ATG because I think he could really compete in any era of fighting. I just said he is not close to top 50 which to me he is not, when you consider all the very exceptional boxers over the years, this is not meant as a slight either, just how I view his overall place in boxing history.

        Comment

        • Jim Jeffries
          rugged individualist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 20741
          • 1,376
          • 2,868
          • 54,838

          #44
          Originally posted by Easy-E
          There is a difference between true age and boxing age. Morales had been in over 50 fights and was old in fighting terms. He was way out of his prime when he beat Pac, and the Raheem fight is proof.
          So I guess Marquez, who'll be 36 in less than two months, and has 55 fights is ancient then right? Hell even Pac is 30, with 54 fights, why is he even still wasting his time in the ring?

          Comment

          • Easy-E
            Gotta want it
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 22686
            • 865
            • 1,743
            • 32,777

            #45
            Originally posted by dde91
            Morales is an ATG no matter how you look at it. Top 50. Top 100, what ever he is, he is a ****in ATG, no questions ask.
            morales is a questionable top 100 fighter of all time. Maybe. And that supposed ATG was completly gone when he beat Pac, lost to Raheem and lost to Pac twice.
            Facts

            Comment

            • dde91
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Oct 2008
              • 2686
              • 86
              • 20
              • 9,217

              #46
              Originally posted by Easy-E
              There is a difference between true age and boxing age. Morales had been in over 50 fights and was old in fighting terms. He was way out of his prime when he beat Pac, and the Raheem fight is proof.
              WOW, then pacquiao should have stopped fighting when he got knocked out huh, because that video showed he couldn't take a body punch.. lol

              everybody has bad fights. Should Margarito stop fighting because Mosely knocked him out. A lot of Good fighters lose to lesser fighters. It is just how the game goes sometimes.

              Comment

              • Easy-E
                Gotta want it
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 22686
                • 865
                • 1,743
                • 32,777

                #47
                Originally posted by Jim Jeffries
                So I guess Marquez, who'll be 36 in less than two months, and has 55 fights is ancient then right? Hell even Pac is 30, with 54 fights, why is he even still wasting his time in the ring?
                They both look a hell of alot better than Morales did. The punishment his body took over the years is far more than Pac and JMM, you cannot argue that.

                Comment

                • Jim Jeffries
                  rugged individualist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 20741
                  • 1,376
                  • 2,868
                  • 54,838

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Easy-E
                  The idiot is the boxing newbie who does not understand the difference between true age and boxing age. He was way out of his prime and had 50+ fights under his belt.
                  Morales was 17 when he started fighting, and 29 at the time of the fight, so yeah, 12 years of boxing and over 50 fights was old.
                  Get a clue, son.
                  Pacquiao was 16 when he turned pro, and is 30, now, so yeah, 14 years of boxing and 54 fights is old.

                  Comment

                  • dde91
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 2686
                    • 86
                    • 20
                    • 9,217

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Easy-E
                    The idiot is the boxing newbie who does not understand the difference between true age and boxing age. He was way out of his prime and had 50+ fights under his belt.
                    Morales was 17 when he started fighting, and 29 at the time of the fight, so yeah, 12 years of boxing and over 50 fights was old.
                    Get a clue, son.
                    Pacquiao was 16 when he started fighting and he was 30 when he fought Hatton, and had over 50 fights, Why isn't he fading?

                    Comment

                    • Easy-E
                      Gotta want it
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22686
                      • 865
                      • 1,743
                      • 32,777

                      #50
                      Originally posted by dde91
                      WOW, then pacquiao should have stopped fighting when he got knocked out huh, because that video showed he couldn't take a body punch.. lol

                      everybody has bad fights. Should Margarito stop fighting because Mosely knocked him out. A lot of Good fighters lose to lesser fighters. It is just how the game goes sometimes.
                      Morales got worked by Raheem, stopped by Pac twice, beat by Diaz and then retired. If that does not make it clear to you that he was completly shot than you are even more ignorant than what your previous posts have represented.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP