Pacquiao was 16 when he turned pro, and is 30, now, so yeah, 14 years of boxing and 54 fights is old.
Yet apparently, he wasnt in his prime when he faced Morales, he is in his prime now. He did not take the punishment over the course of his career that Morales did.
The idiot is the boxing newbie who does not understand the difference between true age and boxing age. He was way out of his prime and had 50+ fights under his belt.
Morales was 17 when he started fighting, and 29 at the time of the fight, so yeah, 12 years of boxing and over 50 fights was old.
Get a clue, son.
Most Boxers start Boxing when they are Very young. Dont pull that "Fought when he was 17 bull****."
He was only 28-30 years old in his Pacquiao trilogy and got KNOCK out twice after he beat him the first time.
Yet apparently, he wasnt in his prime when he faced Morales, he is in his prime now. He did not take the punishment over the course of his career that Morales did.
So he beat Morales when he wasn't in his prime??? DAMN pac is the ****.
yes i have. There were fights he would totally outclass his opposition and not get hit that much. his punishment fights were against Barrera and Pacquiao.
yes i have. There were fights he would totally outclass his opposition and not get hit that much. his punishment fights were against Barrera and Pacquiao.
No, Morales was always a come forward, action fighter who loved to get in exchanges and often got the best of them. It caught up to him after a while.
So he beat Morales when he wasn't in his prime??? DAMN pac is the ****.
According to some. Your argument really makes no sense. Are you trying to say Morales was in his prime when he fought Pac? Or trying to say that he wasnt old and shot?
If that is the case, the facts are piled up against you.
yes i have. There were fights he would totally outclass his opposition and not get hit that much. his punishment fights were against Barrera and Pacquiao.
Only?, are u joking? or did you just start watching boxing?
Tweet
Comment