So you need someone to explain to a boxing journalist on whose "Win was more impressive" when in fact we all knowww ?? Yeah that a great question..
He asked question but they're not good questions just twisted question to get a reaction from a fighter who had a history with, I dont consider "Whose win was more impressive" a good question from a boxing journo.
If Mayweather claimed to be a champ at those weight so what??? Wasnt he a champ at 140 when he beat Gatti??? or didnt other people call themselves champ when they win a world title belt?? or should Mayweather be held to a different standard to everyone else??
Fact are Kinney accuse him of ducking Hatton and the linear champ in Baldomir both who Mayweather end up fighting which made Kinney look ****** and ******ed in the end.
Comment