Marquez - "Mayweather is The Best, Not Pacquiao"

[shadeyfizzle]

is this the same juan manuel marquez that appears on the june cover of ring magazine with a mexican flag d****d around him with the title:


Juan Manuel Marquez
"I wont think im the best until i beat Pacquiao"


The Link;

http://www.ringtv.com/subscribe/

[silip03]

stop hating. real recognize real and no one can speak on it better than JMM. Floyd is the best and everyone deep down knows it

i dont know it floyd is the best.

[JAS_JAS]

is this the same juan manuel marquez that appears on the june cover of ring magazine with a mexican flag d****d around him with the title:


Juan Manuel Marquez
"I wont think im the best until i beat Pacquiao"


The Link;

http://www.ringtv.com/subscribe/

yep, same on brah, the same marquez thats on the same magazine on my sig

[Boxer1590]

the fact that jmm always mentions pac clearly means he knows in his heart that pac is #1.

if jmm really believed that he beat pac, he wouldn't even mention him. I mean you don't hear pac going on and on about jmm.

I think jmm has a fatal attraction for pac.

Im a big fan of Pac and Marquez so I'm not hating on anyone here but....

In my opinion, Marquez always mentions Pacquiao's name is because he feels he was robbed of a win. In his heart he feels he won, but not in the record books. He feels cheated, and wants another chance. Pacquiao doesn't mention Marquez because he's not the one who feels robbed, he got the win. Marquez feels robbed, in what was probably the biggest fight of his entire career and would do the most for him financially and respect wise had he won. Of course he's going to be vocal about it.

[boxing_pundit85]

Pacquiaos resume> Mayweathers resume... Pacquiao is the best in my opinion.

the certainty with which u proclaim pacmans resume to be better just shows waht a ****** you are.... like we could objectively evaluate these two resumes, or come close to anything not littered with bias, and conclude one to be "better', even in a million years, is so fcking ******ed....

and even funnier, u use a mathematical symbol,,implying scientific validity,,, are you even consious of what a fcking idiot you are?

there are a million different factors, actually infinite many factors, (in only 1 fight!) that would influence the worth, or merit, we would afford pacmans victory over odl, in contrast with floyds vicitory over odl, first the easy ones, age differemces, weight class differecnes, ......then less obvious differences i.e. how golden boy promotions would be afftected, how the fights needed to be interparated by the general boxing community to keep boxing viable, how to promote the most lucrative future fights for all parties involded, there are infinite combinations, and interapatations for these factors in every ****ing fight!, thats over 75 fights between both resumes....... please enlighten on your formula, maybe u are einstein reincanated, if so i would like u to pm me.. thx

[JAS_JAS]

the certainty with which u proclaim pacmans resume to be better just shows waht a ****** you are.... like we could objectively evaluate these two resumes, or come close to anything not littered with bias, and conclude one to be "better', even in a million years, is so fcking ******ed....

and even funnier, u use a mathematical symbol,,implying scientific validity,,, are you even consious of what a fcking idiot you are?

and in your opinion who is the most deserving to be P4P #1 fighter today, and methods are you going to use to compare them?

[silip03]

How do you figure that? Pacquio is no faster or stronger then he was last year when he fought JMM... It may seem like he's faster fighting a ODLH who wasnt moving at all or stronger hitting someone clean coming straight at you with their hands down... But nope, same Pacquio as last year... And JMM will give him all kinds of problems just like before if they fought again

how about hatton? how can you say about him fighting also hands down? is Odlh and hatton are pro?

[boxing_pundit85]

and in your opinion who is the most deserving to be P4P #1 fighter today, and methods are you going to use to compare them?

im not going to make a blanket statement, i am going to acknowledge the impressive victories on both resumes, and wait for a (quasi)decisive answer, a fight

[Technical_Skill]

Hold why on, why are people using P4P1 as some sort of proof pac is the best?

To date mayweather is the best boxer in the sport, pacquaio is the mythical p4p no 1.

[boxing_pundit85]

Hold why on, why are people using P4P1 as some sort of proof pac is the best?

To date mayweather is the best boxer in the sport, pacquaio is the mythical p4p no 1.

good point, by their logic pac man should be favored agaisnt haye or kiltz