The Klitchsko terms for the Haye fight; the worst ive ever seen.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ishy Aytan
    Undisputed Champion
    • Apr 2008
    • 2184
    • 66
    • 64
    • 8,726

    #1

    The Klitchsko terms for the Haye fight; the worst ive ever seen.

    I mean, if Haye wins he has to fight Wladmir again and then fight Vitali.


    WTF??????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????

    So in the next 2 years he has his fighting schedule set. Within this time he wont be given the opportunity to face guys like Arreola and the other up and coming heavyweights.


    How many good years will Haye have as a Heavyweight? If he beats Wladmir, he'll be fighting them for another 2 years; 3 in total.

    He's currently 28 years old, he could hit 30 by the time he's finished fighting the Klitchsko's.


    Is it only me or dont no one else see this as an unfair terms for a fight?


    I mean, if any other fighter did it they'd be critisized right?



    What you guys think?
  • Ishy Aytan
    Undisputed Champion
    • Apr 2008
    • 2184
    • 66
    • 64
    • 8,726

    #2
    **** still no response to this thread......?


    You guys still writing about Floyd and Pac hey. lol



    Comment

    • larry x
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 10715
      • 499
      • 247
      • 11,556

      #3
      the terms are terrible..but if haye believes what he say he gets to ko both brothers get all the belts and get paid bigtime..all while proving he's the ****..so it aint all that bad...if he can back up what he said..they are basically calling his bluff..now he has to deliver

      Comment

      • S.G.
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 9412
        • 296
        • 635
        • 16,360

        #4
        Hopefully all of the clauses won't be exercised and Haye only has to fight Wlad once and Vitali once

        I think it's unlikely that Wlad will be keen on a rematch if he gets KTFO, which is what will likely happen if Haye wins. I mean, if the fight deserves a rematch then that's fine, go for it. I'm sure there won't be too much complaining

        Then onto Vitali who's knocking on a bit... If he loses I don't think he'll fight again

        At the end of the day we're seeing the fights that we want most. It's unfortunate that Haye/Povetkin and Haye/Arreola might not happen for a long time but Haye is frying bigger fish, and top boxers don't fight very often these days, it's just how it is

        Comment

        • S.G.
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2008
          • 9412
          • 296
          • 635
          • 16,360

          #5
          And if Wlad or Vitali win then obviously it won't be an issue. So, yeah. I genuinely think Haye will only have to fight them once each providing he doesn't fall at the first hurdle

          Comment

          • Ishy Aytan
            Undisputed Champion
            • Apr 2008
            • 2184
            • 66
            • 64
            • 8,726

            #6
            Yeh i see what you guys mean, but being in Haye's shoes imagine if he stops Wladmir, then unneccesarily fights him again and beats him again, he has too fight Vitali, all within 3 years!


            And the worst thing about it is if Haye losses he dont get no rematch. lol

            Comment

            • Ishy Aytan
              Undisputed Champion
              • Apr 2008
              • 2184
              • 66
              • 64
              • 8,726

              #7
              Originally posted by TheManchine.
              Yeah, I mean it's not like promoters ever try to get options on the opponent's future fights


              Your missing the point, promoters usually take stages when deciding opponents. This to me makes little sense, especially because Haye has no rematch if he losses.

              Comment

              • TheManchine
                Finnish Fraud
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 5119
                • 247
                • 343
                • 12,065

                #8
                Yeah, I mean it's not like promoters ever try to get options on the opponent's future fights

                Comment

                • Ishy Aytan
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2184
                  • 66
                  • 64
                  • 8,726

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The_Visitation
                  Yes, but they are the biggest fights he could get if he was free to choose, anyway, and in the unlikely event he wins all three bouts he would be the undisputed top dog at HW regardless of which alphabelts he actually held. He won't get there fighting the likes of Arreola.

                  Congratulations on your 1000th post!



                  Comment

                  • The_Visitation
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1570
                    • 49
                    • 24
                    • 7,791

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Ishy Aytan

                    He's currently 28 years old, he could hit 30 by the time he's finished fighting the Klitchsko's.
                    Yes, but they are the biggest fights he could get if he was free to choose, anyway, and in the unlikely event he wins all three bouts he would be the undisputed top dog at HW regardless of which alphabelts he actually held. He won't get there fighting the likes of Arreola.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP