Who was more of a wasted talent

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

Well since he retired in his prime or before his prime, Naz was more wasted talent.

Imagine the fights that could of been made afterwards and his true comeback, much like Money Mays year and a half layoff, in that time there could of been good match ups and $$$ to be made.

IMO

[The Gully Gad]

Not so much in achievements wise but i'd say Naz because we all know he was capable of a ***ing whole lot more....

He got rich and got fat and the hunger went

[P4PKING_2008 :)]

im glad larry took my side here against p4p******. p4p doesn't make any sense for real. zab judah is a bum and he's always ****riding him. ok and before you evne say it i know he rocked cotto at 2nd round b ut it's not about that it's about who beats the other guy up and cotto demolished zab.

Cotto was out on his feet against Zab. And he quits when it gets tough. He landed 17 (yes I counted) low blows against Margarito but because Marg has no balls he was unaffected. When he cant cheat to win he quits like a lil *****.

Zab >>>>>>>> Quitto anyday of the week.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Y doesnt that make sense...makes perfect sense to me and i agree

Because Naz only really had one big fight and couldve had several more mega fights, fought for more titles, in different divsions etc. Hence he underachieved.

Judah had several big fights and failed in all of them. Maybe he underachieved as well but not to the same extent. Maybe he just wasnt good enough.

[fightingwords89]

Because Naz only really had one big fight and couldve had several more mega fights, fought for more titles, in different divsions etc. Hence he underachieved.

Judah had several big fights and failed in all of them. Maybe he underachieved as well but not to the same extent. Maybe he just wasnt good enough.

I understand where ur commin from but i just didnt see Naz hangin in there with Barrera obviously then think whos left Morales, JMM, Juarez, Paquiao, John i dont see him beating any of them thus what he did and the level he got too to me was overachieving..does that make sense to u?

[IIG]

I knew the answer was Zab before I clicked on the thread.

[K-Nan]

It's not over for Zab quite yet. We still have the chance to see whether he can breathe new life into his career at 140.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I understand where ur commin from but i just didnt see Naz hangin in there with Barrera obviously then think whos left Morales, JMM, Juarez, Paquiao, John i dont see him beating any of them thus what he did and the level he got too to me was overachieving..does that make sense to u?

No not really. LOL@ Juarez and John by the way.

Styles make fights, Naz losing to Barrera doesnt mean he couldnt hang with those guys. Remember that was an unfocused Naz against Barrera and it wasnt a complete schooling as some tend to say. Naz had the skill and the big fights left to become a great.

Judah tested his skills against the best several times and failed so perhaps that was his level.

[K-Nan]

Zab was just physically overpowered at Welterweight. His other loss to Mayweather was a close one against the best fighter in the game. And he gave Floyd his best fight to date.

[fightingwords89]

No not really. LOL@ Juarez and John by the way.

Styles make fights, Naz losing to Barrera doesnt mean he couldnt hang with those guys. Remember that was an unfocused Naz against Barrera and it wasnt a complete schooling as some tend to say. Naz had the skill and the big fights left to become a great.

Judah tested his skills against the best several times and failed so perhaps that was his level.

why are Juarez and John laughable?