How good is Floyd's resume?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Smash
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 14577
    • 6,076
    • 7,524
    • 21,172

    #61
    Originally posted by Eaner0919
    all I neeeded to know
    Not sure what that means, i havnt mastered the art of mind reading over the net yet, care to elaborate?

    Just as a side not, how do you rate chico and castillo to the guys i mentioned (floyd pac hopkins etc) and how do you rate chico and castillo in relation to the other 2 i mentioned, juddah and baldo?

    Comment

    • El Dominicano
      Banned
      • Aug 2007
      • 10074
      • 226
      • 49
      • 10,758

      #62
      Originally posted by Smash
      Not sure what that means, i havnt mastered the art of mind reading over the net yet, care to elaborate?

      Just as a side not, how do you rate chico and castillo to the guys i mentioned (floyd pac hopkins etc) and how do you rate chico and castillo in relation to the other 2 i mentioned, juddah and baldo?
      Its means your fucking ****** to think JLC and Corrales are even comparable to Judah and baldy.

      Comment

      • winac
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jan 2009
        • 507
        • 13
        • 1
        • 596

        #63
        None of those options are a good pick

        Comment

        • Smash
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2008
          • 14577
          • 6,076
          • 7,524
          • 21,172

          #64
          Damn people are actually saying thats floyds cv is better than anyone elses out there! I think you will lose credability for that one. Jmm would be a nice add to it and pac would be even nicer. Top that off with either one or both of cotto and mosley and hey presto, very impressive. I think floyd can do it but i think he may stop after pac. I hope im wrong

          Comment

          • Luis12
            Undisputed Champion
            • Mar 2009
            • 1191
            • 17
            • 6
            • 7,327

            #65
            Originally posted by winac
            None of those options are a good pick
            AGREED.

            floyd need to fight cotto and mosley.

            floyd's resume is good but not great. and he only looked great against baldo, gatti and bruseles. against the others fighters, DLH, castillo and judah looked good but not great.

            Comment

            • -EX-
              Trading Block Tycoon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 21258
              • 720
              • 689
              • 32,678

              #66
              Originally posted by D-Omonist
              Umm...ok!
              Castillo, Corrales, Hatton, old DLH, Judah, G.Hernandez >old Mosley, Judah, Quintana, Malignaggi, and Torres

              Comment

              • Luis12
                Undisputed Champion
                • Mar 2009
                • 1191
                • 17
                • 6
                • 7,327

                #67
                Originally posted by The_Executioner
                Castillo, Corrales, Hatton, old DLH, Judah, G.Hernandez >old Mosley, Judah, Quintana, Malignaggi, and Torres
                why old mosley?? he looked excellent in the last fight.

                cotto and moslet can beat floyd and i believe mosley can beat him more easy than cotto even by ko

                Comment

                • Smash
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 14577
                  • 6,076
                  • 7,524
                  • 21,172

                  #68
                  Originally posted by El Dominicano
                  Its means your fucking ****** to think JLC and Corrales are even comparable to Judah and baldy.
                  Am i really? Say a floyd and pac are a 10. Then corrales and chico are a 7 and juddah and baldo are a 5. That means corrales and chico are closer imo to juddah and baldo than floyd and pac, ******.

                  Re read my post, i never said they were comparable, i said they were closer, do you understand ******?

                  Give me your ratings please
                  Last edited by Smash; 05-13-2009, 12:08 PM.

                  Comment

                  • El Dominicano
                    Banned
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 10074
                    • 226
                    • 49
                    • 10,758

                    #69
                    Originally posted by Smash
                    Am i really? Say a floyd and pac are a 10. Then corrales and chico are a 7 and juddah and baldo are a 5. That means corrales and chico are closer imo to juddah and baldo than floyd and pac, ******.

                    Re read my post, i never said they were comparable, i said they were closer, do you understand ******?
                    Lmao know your talking numbers, dude! Corrales, JLC >>>>>>> Judah and Baldy, not even close. You should wonder why people trash Mayweather's resume from 140-147, dumb ass

                    Comment

                    • Eaner0919
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 8625
                      • 370
                      • 80
                      • 15,578

                      #70
                      Originally posted by Smash
                      Not sure what that means, i havnt mastered the art of mind reading over the net yet, care to elaborate?

                      Just as a side not, how do you rate chico and castillo to the guys i mentioned (floyd pac hopkins etc) and how do you rate chico and castillo in relation to the other 2 i mentioned, juddah and baldo?
                      no I dont care honestly. I dont think your thought process is enough to realize you honestly come up short when discussing anything beyond surface level

                      to answer your questions

                      1) comparing how? resume, styles, accomplishments what? be clear when you ask questions

                      2) in terms of resume in terms of style in terms of intangibles both fighters stack up better than the ones you mentioned. I could break it down for you but to be honest I would rather debate with people who actually know what they are talking about

                      you sound like nothing more than a recent casual fan who thinks they know the sport so I will leave it at that

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP