Who is better Miguel Cotto or Floyd Mayweather?

[p4p-champ]

I imagine Floyd along the ropes... Cottos attempts to goto the body, and while he does... Floyd has a field day with upper cuts.

I see the exact same thing. Cotto leaves himself open, hes been hurt and often against much lesser opponents. He likes to duck down with his hand at the sides of his head which leaves his chin open to uppercuts. I see Mayweather easily fighting in the pocket against him and knocking that chin with uppercuts. Only thing Cotto has going for him are his vicious body shots.

In terms of who is the better all round boxer, Mayweather easily.

[larry x]

I would put all my points on the line but you and I both know it will never happen.
Mayweather prefers to fight Super Featherweights and not real threats inside his own division.

so if cotto went up to 160..would he be a coward for fighting someone at 147

[rizkybizness]

cotto defends better against uppercuts and his overall defense is superior IMO

[-----------]

ok fine..lets see cotto at 154-160

hahahahah




I was right, I was right

Championi




Suck my wang *****!

[Ravishing]

Floyd is the more skilled of the two, but Cotto can beat him as Floyd can beat Cotto as well.

[larry x]

hahahahah




I was right, I was right

Championi




Suck my wang *****!

i was going my number of weight classes..168 wouldve been cottos 5th..160 his 4th

[Ravishing]

so if cotto went up to 160..would he be a coward for fighting someone at 147

Unless Cotto had fought at 160 for 3-4 years, then I'd say it was a bit of cherry picking to fight a Weltwerweight.

[-----------]

i was going my number of weight classes..168 wouldve been cottos 5th..160 his 4th

But now do you see how that is an unfair view?

[rican4life]

yea right. please. joe is trememndous but better then both I don't think so..

[boxasmash]

mayweather is beter skillwise but cotto beats him one on one.