Who is better Miguel Cotto or Floyd Mayweather?

[-----------]

I think Miguel Cotto is better.





Discuss

[Xyei]

Floyd is the better, more complete fighter IMO.

[-----------]

Guys help me out here, I really want to get into the Cotto Cartel.

Can someone say they think Mayweather is better and give a reason so I can defend it.

[KittenFlaps]

Mayweather is better. He is far less fun to watch, and pretty mucha gigantic D-bag, but he is a more talented, well rounded fighter.

(please note that I am a Cotto fan and would always root for him.)

[-----------]

Floyd is the better, more complete fighter IMO.

I think Cotto is more complete because he has tested himself against the true best of HIS division, not fighting smaller guys like Mayweather.


*That ****s gotta be enough to get in*

[larry x]

Guys help me out here, I really want to get into the Cotto Cartel.

Can someone say they think Mayweather is better and give a reason so I can defend it.

floyd is better..better defense better ring generalship,more stamina,smarter fighter...but cotto is a good solid fighter and cant be disliked

[-MAKAVELLI-]

joe calzaghe is better than both of these bums

[larry x]

I think Cotto is more complete because he has tested himself against the true best of HIS division, not fighting smaller guys like Mayweather.


*That ****s gotta be enough to get in*

floyd in his second division like cotto is in fought the best..twice castillo

[Bhopreign]

When Miguel goes to 168 and beats someone then this question might make me think a little as of now Floyd by a country mile.

[THE REED]

I think Cotto is more complete because he has tested himself against the true best of HIS division, not fighting smaller guys like Mayweather.


*That ****s gotta be enough to get in*

Did you think Floyd started out at Welter? You know he had an entire career before welterweight, right?

Floyds skills are completely superior to Cotto's