Stay updated with the latest boxing news, fight results, interviews, and rankings. Get real-time coverage of upcoming bouts, analysis, and exclusive insights from the world of boxing.
If , at that point, you say "Oh, I'm not buying any 'inside sources' bull****", then fine. Stop reading, and move along.
Because if I got the information from Joe Smith, Director of Sports Programming at HBO, then i'm surely not going to put that on a boxing board....right? Where does that leave Joe?
But, consider this: I told you a week ago that HBO wouldn't be releasing the numbers. Did you see that anywhere else? Where are the numbers? Alrighty then.
Not revealing a source doesn't make something noit a fact. It makes it a fact without attribution.
That is all fine and good, but you have to accept the fact that because you are trying to protecting your source, you are unable to prove your figures as fact and thus are open to criticism. Posters have the right to call out your numbers as BS. There is no winner in this situation and chances are no one can be proven right or wrong unless HBO or other sources close to the situation releases their figures.
That is all fine and good, but you have to accept the fact that because you are trying to protecting your source, you are unable to prove your figures as fact and thus are open to criticism. Posters have the right to call out your numbers as BS. There is no winner in this situation and chances are no one can be proven right or wrong unless HBO or other sources close to the situation releases their figures.
I don't have a problem with anyone who says they prefer a source. That is 100000000% understandable.
But when the figures finally DO come out, I will be clowning the morons who said I was WRONG.
Again, there's a difference between being wrong and being unverified.
Comment