Eddie Chambers vs. Calvin Brock

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BmoreBrawler
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2006
    • 4594
    • 130
    • 315
    • 11,672

    #11
    Originally posted by DWiens421
    Are these punch stats accurate? I know that punch stats aren't everything, but... that is a damn big gap in punch stats. I have a hard time seeing that big of a domination only spaced out between 5 rounds that Brock won:

    Data Boxing reported the blows as Brock 262/587 45%, Chambers 151/439 34%.

    I do remember a lot of people scored this fight for Chambers.

    Anyway, good decision/bad decision?

    Good fight/bad fight?

    Anything else anyone wants to add would be appreciated.
    Sounds like a Mosley/DLH 2 type robbery but I didnt see the fight.

    Comment

    • AKATheMack
      Unreasonably Logical
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 11155
      • 430
      • 285
      • 19,179

      #12
      Originally posted by darkstar777
      Ever since his loss to Povetkin, Chambers improved in his footwork and punch-output. Someone needs to tell him that he doesn't need to weight 220lbs to be an effective heavyweight.

      I would favor Chambers over Vitali, Valuev, and Chagaev. He's currently the best American heavyweight.
      Vitali beats him soundly and so does a healthy Chagaev. What have you seen that impresses you?

      Comment

      • Boxingwizard
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2007
        • 4298
        • 126
        • 190
        • 12,228

        #13
        Originally posted by ReppinDubK
        Vitali beats him soundly and so does a healthy Chagaev. What have you seen that impresses you?
        This

        Comment

        • AKATheMack
          Unreasonably Logical
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 11155
          • 430
          • 285
          • 19,179

          #14
          Originally posted by darkstar777
          This

          Dont be fooled by arm punches. He has no pop at all Vitali walks right through those pitty pats and puts a beatdown on him. He'll do good against unaggressive boxers or slow plodders like Peter. An aggressive fighter who will take punches to land punches can come straight forward without much risk of getting hurt.

          Comment

          • Boxingwizard
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2007
            • 4298
            • 126
            • 190
            • 12,228

            #15
            Originally posted by ReppinDubK
            Dont be fooled by arm punches. He has no pop at all Vitali walks right through those pitty pats and puts a beatdown on him. He'll do good against unaggressive boxers or slow plodders like Peter. An aggressive fighter who will take punches to land punches can come straight forward without much risk of getting hurt.
            Chambers has underrated power, he is known for cutting opponents, I've seen opponents have pizza faces after they fought Chambers. Look at Povetkin's face after he fought Chambers, his right eye was completely bruised and close to being cut (in other words it was a mess). If Chambers had a higher punch output he would have a higher TKO percentage.
            Last edited by Boxingwizard; 05-06-2009, 06:40 PM.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP