Could Pacman Win Record 7th and 8th Division titles/belts?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iron lung
    Banned
    • Jan 2009
    • 690
    • 36
    • 22
    • 923

    #11
    the guy has a point, every belt but the wbo I believe is vacant at 147 that means Pac can somehow fight for it with a bum and win. Even Collazo I think Pac will do good against for 2 reasons: 1. Collazo obviously doesn't hit that hard for a WW and 2. Hatton beat Collazo

    Comment

    • iron lung
      Banned
      • Jan 2009
      • 690
      • 36
      • 22
      • 923

      #12
      bump .

      Comment

      • larry x
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 10715
        • 499
        • 247
        • 11,556

        #13
        Originally posted by jackolythe
        What about Chavez Jr at 154? Doesn't he have a belt?
        hell naw..he hasnt even fought a contender

        Comment

        • larry x
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 10715
          • 499
          • 247
          • 11,556

          #14
          Originally posted by iron lung
          the guy has a point, every belt but the wbo I believe is vacant at 147 that means Pac can somehow fight for it with a bum and win. Even Collazo I think Pac will do good against for 2 reasons: 1. Collazo obviously doesn't hit that hard for a WW and 2. Hatton beat Collazo
          ???no belt is vacant at 147 but the ibf
          mosley-wba
          berto-wbc
          cotto-wbo

          Comment

          • flipbjefrox
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 5175
            • 362
            • 78
            • 62,737

            #15
            Originally posted by iron lung
            the guy has a point, every belt but the wbo I believe is vacant at 147 that means Pac can somehow fight for it with a bum and win. Even Collazo I think Pac will do good against for 2 reasons: 1. Collazo obviously doesn't hit that hard for a WW and 2. Hatton beat Collazo
            seriously get off wikipedia... only the ibf is vacant at ww.

            Stay updated with the latest boxing news, fight results, interviews, and rankings. Get real-time coverage of upcoming bouts, analysis, and exclusive insights from the world of boxing.

            Comment

            • iron lung
              Banned
              • Jan 2009
              • 690
              • 36
              • 22
              • 923

              #16
              Originally posted by larrysmith
              ???no belt is vacant at 147 but the ibf
              mosley-wba
              berto-wbc
              cotto-wbo
              you're right, I forgot. well Pac can't handle berto or Mosley too much speed/power. Maybe he can handle Cotto because he fights more in spurts and has far slower foot speed than the others so Pac may be able to dodge in and out. We'll have to see.

              Comment

              • Zerwas1
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2005
                • 2878
                • 119
                • 205
                • 9,990

                #17
                147 he can Cotto and Berto are possible
                154 Maybe a vacant title against a picked contender, but that's not his style.

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #18
                  if pac gets a WW at a catchweight, technically he will get the belt.

                  if pac gets a jr MW at a catchweight, technically he will get the belt if he wins.

                  Comment

                  • iron lung
                    Banned
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 690
                    • 36
                    • 22
                    • 923

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Pullcounter
                    if pac gets a WW at a catchweight, technically he will get the belt.

                    if pac gets a jr MW at a catchweight, technically he will get the belt if he wins.
                    who would give him credit for the belt if it's at a catch weight? I don't know about that, is there a precedent for this?

                    Comment

                    • hishaam15
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 1504
                      • 55
                      • 79
                      • 7,711

                      #20
                      LOL. No way Pac beats a top 10 154lber

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP