Team Pacquiao taking a gamble in training?

[-Antonio-]

When I read a flat statement like" Hatton beat Malignaggi worse than Cotto", I laugh, because it makes the author sound like a weird hybrid of NOOB and SPAZ.

Just because Paul was more competetive with Cotto than he was Hatton, doesn't mean Hatton "beat him way worse".


Common or garden youtube rat. Shut the hell up yourself.

Dont waste your time. These guys are hopeless. How can they not understand the fact that McGirt threw in the towel? It's hilarious.

[iron lung]

Dont waste your time. These guys are hopeless. How can they not understand the fact that McGirt threw in the towel? It's hilarious.

you ******, mcgirt threw in the towel and Paulie's trainer in the Cotto fight didn't. Why? Because some people had Paulie even or ahead on points adn the fight was a close 115-112, meaning Paulie still maybe had a chance. In Hatton's fight he was far more dominantly outclassed and thus his trainer realized it's pointless to continue taking such punishment.
Can you not see the difference? Are you mentally disabled, ******ed, a downy?

[-Antonio-]

[-Antonio-]

you ******, mcgirt threw in the towel and Paulie's trainer in the Cotto fight didn't. Why? Because some people had Paulie even or ahead on points adn the fight was a close 115-112, meaning Paulie still maybe had a chance. In Hatton's fight he was far more dominantly outclassed and thus his trainer realized it's pointless to continue taking such punishment.
Can you not see the difference? Are you mentally disabled, ******ed, a downy?

Sounds like a lot of excuses coming from you when the fact is Hatton stopped him, Cotto couldn't, nuff said. There was an obvious reason to stop it in the Hatton fight as he was taking far more punishment

Did you not type that? Maybe I am ******ed. I must have misunderstood what you wrote there. My bad.

[-Antonio-]

Some people had Paulie ahead huh? I'd like to see those people. It's too bad they wont be able to see me, because they're probably blind.

[-X-]

I do understand the point of Malignaggis face was brutally beat up and yes Cotto did way more damage than Hatton in that sense, i was more or less talking about the whole picture of just a total beatdown, winning every minute of every round type thing.

[iron lung]

Did you not type that? Maybe I am ******ed. I must have misunderstood what you wrote there. My bad.

I don't know what it was you attempted to do but seemed like a cowardly attempt at changing the topic.

Here's the topic you damn downy in case your ritalin has wore off, and let me speak it very slowly and clearly with big block letters as to a ******ed child:

Paulie's towel was thrown in during the Hatton fight because he was being brutally dominated, outclassed, beat up, and lost every conceivable round.

Paulie's towel was NOT thrown in during the Cotto fight because the fight was a relatively close 115-112 and his trainer obviously felt that Paulie still had a chance to pull off the upset since some people felt the fight was relatively close and critics even wrote that "Malignaggi confused and frustrated Cotto at times" whereas Paulie did NO SUCH THING EVER in the Hatton fight.

OWNED.

[xxjace]

After watching countless hours of footage in the build up to this fight, 24/7, Sky's studio countdown, various interviews etc. I notice that Roach and Co seem to be expecting Hatton to "revert back to his old ways".

Watching 24/7, they seem to be training for the inevitable Hatton rough housing, bullying tactics.

Isn't it too much of a gamble to concentrate most of your training on an assumption that your opponent even denies? What if Hatton pressures forward but uses angles instead of wrapping his arms around Pac? Something old Floyd and Ricky both agree on, and have obviously trained for.

Malignaggi and a lot of people in these forums were taken by surprise the same way. A lot of people thought Malignaggi would simply tame Hatton as he charged forward, but it was in fact Malignaggi that was out boxed. I know Malignaggi is not Pacman, but I'm making the point that camps assume the wrong things and trrain for the wrong fight.

Should Roach really be concentrating so much on Hatton and his past wrestling style fights?

great point..I think Hatton is gonna come out as the new Hatton and shock the world and Manny..

[xxjace]

After watching countless hours of footage in the build up to this fight, 24/7, Sky's studio countdown, various interviews etc. I notice that Roach and Co seem to be expecting Hatton to "revert back to his old ways".

Watching 24/7, they seem to be training for the inevitable Hatton rough housing, bullying tactics.

Isn't it too much of a gamble to concentrate most of your training on an assumption that your opponent even denies? What if Hatton pressures forward but uses angles instead of wrapping his arms around Pac? Something old Floyd and Ricky both agree on, and have obviously trained for.

Malignaggi and a lot of people in these forums were taken by surprise the same way. A lot of people thought Malignaggi would simply tame Hatton as he charged forward, but it was in fact Malignaggi that was out boxed. I know Malignaggi is not Pacman, but I'm making the point that camps assume the wrong things and trrain for the wrong fight.

Should Roach really be concentrating so much on Hatton and his past wrestling style fights?

good points I dropped you rep for that..

[-Antonio-]

"Hatton stopped him, Cotto couldn't, nuff said. There was an obvious reason to stop it in the Hatton fight as he was taking far more punishment "

Plain and basic common sense.