Pacquiaos Achievements Are Blown Out Of Proportion

[dumber79]

Errr, thanks.

don't mention it chump.

[Texanballer]

What fighter doesn't have problems when facing other capable, prime fighters?

Well each time Pacquiao fought one of these fighters in their prime he arguably lost each one.

[Maestro USA]

wrong.

he was ranked #2 at 130 by most everyone including the ring before the 1st fight.

erik was also the favorite against manny the 1st 2 times they fought. he was also only the underdog for the 3rd fight after manny koed him.

Wrong, he was the underdog since he was coming off a loss to Barrera. A 2/1 underdog. It's mentioned on the British Broadcast of the Morales vs Pacquiao I fight.

He was even more of a underdog after Raheem had just white washed Morales and proved he was shot.

[S A M U R A I]

Well each time Pacquiao fought one of these fighters in their prime he arguably lost each one.

What a load of crap!



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[strugler]

i never used racism huh?....80% of pac fans are just horrendous fans, from my expiernce out on the street and here......the haton fans tend to be humble.....i myself said pac has a hall of fame resume and is a manny fan....but some of the people I know in vegas are rooting against the guy to get brutally massacred for how classless they acted after the oscar win....thats what i mean by that last post....if you have one bad thing to say about manny its like the world has ended......

and i have always given manny credit where credit is due....but its FACT some of his acclaimed wins are just wins...nothing special....the title of the thread is accurate.

Naaaaah...............based on NSB?...................Pac is a popular fella....what do you expect?...ofcourse some nuthugger will come once in a while making ridiculous claims....guess what?....so does any other fans of other fighters..........the TS copied and pasted the thread........which practically made pacs resume mediocre.............and youre complaining about being classless?..............LMAO........

[Maestro USA]

Well each time Pacquiao fought one of these fighters in their prime he arguably lost each one.

He only faced two, Barrera and Marquez. He beat Barrera, but I thought he lost both fights to Marquez.

Morales was washed up by the time Pac faced him, but he lost that one pretty badly anyway.

[Left Hook Tua]

Wrong, he was the underdog since he was coming off a loss to Barrera. A 2/1 underdog. It's mentioned on the British Broadcast of the Morales vs Pacquiao I fight.

He was even more of a underdog after Raheem had just white washed Morales and proved he was shot.

you're trippin.

pacquiao was coming up from 126. it was his first fight at 130 ever.

i remember people saying he might have problems with morales size.

let me try and look it up. i don't trust your bs ass.

[Left Hook Tua]

He only faced two, Barrera and Marquez. He beat Barrera, but I thought he lost both fights to Marquez.

Morales was washed up by the time Pac faced him, but he lost that one pretty badly anyway.

yes. 115-113 is a terrible blowout.

[Left Hook Tua]

pacman has the better resume,it an ATG, can't agree more.


what i don't get is why a stockport lad is such a hatton hater???

i'm not a ricky hater.

i actually defend ricky. just against him on this one. i'm a bigger fan of manny than i am of ricky.

i'm one of the only ones that never took ricky out of the p4p list jsut because he lost to floyd.

i even made a ricky's resume is better than calzaghe's thread. lol

not a stockport lad btw. that's ricky's birthplace.

[dumber79]

i'm not a ricky hater.

i actually defend ricky. just against him on this one. i'm a bigger fan of manny than i am of ricky.

i'm one of the only ones that never took ricky out of the p4p list jsut because he lost to floyd.

i even made a ricky's resume is better than calzaghe's thread. lol

not a stockport lad btw. that's ricky's birthplace.

fair do's.

bit of a sick obsession don't you think