The Hagler vs Hearns fight is overrated

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thread Stealer
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2007
    • 9657
    • 439
    • 102
    • 17,804

    #21
    Originally posted by Google_It_Bitch
    Please start your list so we can agree or disagree with you. When making your list please give details and examples or don't even bother posting anything at all but I am very interested in your list of fights that smash Hagler/Hearns. There are HISTORIANS that have this fight ranked up there as the best three rounds in boxing. Are you some kind of historian? One we have yet to hear from? Drop the list. Thank you.
    If I'm just speaking about action/drama, and not the EVENT, these are some of the fights I rank above Hagler-Hearns.

    Saad-Lopez 2
    Saad-M. Johnson 1
    Chacon-Edwards 2
    Chacon-Limon 4
    Ali-Frazier 1 and 3
    Corrales-Castillo 1
    Barrera-Morales 1
    Carbajal-Gonzalez 1
    Trinidad-Vargas
    Sithatchawal-Monishpour
    Gatti-Robinson 1
    Pryor-Arguello 1

    Comment

    • Google_It_Bitch
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 1331
      • 92
      • 70
      • 1,585

      #22
      Originally posted by Thread Stealer
      If I'm just speaking about action/drama, and not the EVENT, these are some of the fights I rank above Hagler-Hearns.

      Saad-Lopez 2
      Saad-M. Johnson 1
      Chacon-Edwards 2
      Chacon-Limon 4
      Ali-Frazier 1 and 3
      Corrales-Castillo 1
      Barrera-Morales 1
      Carbajal-Gonzalez 1
      Trinidad-Vargas
      Sithatchawal-Monishpour
      Gatti-Robinson 1
      Pryor-Arguello 1
      Well then you misunderstand the nomination Hagler and Hearns are under.
      It has been called the greatest 3 rounds in boxing. It is not called the greatest fight ever. I can sit here all day talking about great fights and your list mentions plenty but I wont argue that Hagler vs Hearns is one of the greatest 3 rounders I have ever seen because it was a title fight and many expected it to be a long faught war and it turned out to be a back and forth barn burner that ended about as quickly as it began.

      Comment

      • Thread Stealer
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 9657
        • 439
        • 102
        • 17,804

        #23
        Originally posted by Google_It_Bitch
        Well then you misunderstand the nomination Hagler and Hearns are under.
        It has been called the greatest 3 rounds in boxing. It is not called the greatest fight ever. I can sit here all day talking about great fights and your list mentions plenty but I wont argue that Hagler vs Hearns is one of the greatest 3 rounders I have ever seen because it was a title fight and many expected it to be a long faught war and it turned out to be a back and forth barn burner that ended about as quickly as it began.
        As I said before, it all depends on who's doing the rating.

        Some rate it at the top of their "short fights" list (it's up there on mine), some people rate it at the top of their fights list, period.

        As far as 3 round fights go, another one of the best is Liles-Littles 2. Not quite the sustained action of Hagler-Hearns round 1, but plenty of KDs, fouls, with both guys being down and hurt.

        Comment

        • Google_It_Bitch
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 1331
          • 92
          • 70
          • 1,585

          #24
          Originally posted by Thread Stealer
          As I said before, it all depends on who's doing the rating.

          Some rate it at the top of their "short fights" list (it's up there on mine), some people rate it at the top of their fights list, period.

          As far as 3 round fights go, another one of the best is Liles-Littles 2. Not quite the sustained action of Hagler-Hearns round 1, but plenty of KDs, fouls, with both guys being down and hurt.
          I have not seen either fight so I am going to download them both thanks for tip Just started reading about it doing google of course and it sounds like a must have. Good lookin' out.
          :PAZ:

          Comment

          • Thread Stealer
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2007
            • 9657
            • 439
            • 102
            • 17,804

            #25
            Originally posted by Google_It_Bitch
            I have not seen either fight so I am going to download them both thanks for tip Just started reading about it doing google of course and it sounds like a must have. Good lookin' out.
            :PAZ:
            I've never seen Liles-Littles 1 either. Only the rematch.

            Comment

            • Dynamite Kid
              Slicker than your average
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 20701
              • 627
              • 209
              • 38,291

              #26
              Originally posted by Zarco
              Im tired of hearing "will this be another hagler-hearns" "people are comparing this fight to hagler-hearns". Hey yea thanks for that helluva first round. But the tired fellas only gave us 2 more decent rounds. Ive seen much better fights that lasted more than 3 rounds to hype fights up with, but classics(old ****) plays into peoples minds i guess.
              I agree for the same reason as you and Threadsteeler stated. It was a great 1st round, but......

              Comment

              • Dynamite Kid
                Slicker than your average
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2007
                • 20701
                • 627
                • 209
                • 38,291

                #27
                Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                I've never seen Liles-Littles 1 either. Only the rematch.
                Thread Stealer i know its controversial but i think Carbajal vs Gonzalez is easily one of the most overrated FOTY ive ever seen. Its right up there with the borefest that was Holmes vs Spinks.

                I have no idea how Spinks v Holmes made FOTY.

                Comment

                • Thread Stealer
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 9657
                  • 439
                  • 102
                  • 17,804

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                  Thread Stealer i know its controversial but i think Carbajal vs Gonzalez is easily one of the most overrated FOTY ive ever seen. Its right up there with the borefest that was Holmes vs Spinks.


                  Are we talking about the same Carbajal-Gonzalez fight? The first one?

                  As far as recent FOTYs go, Holyfield-Tyson 1 in 96' was extremely overrated. Barrera-McKinney was far more deserving. So were Golota-Bowe 2 and Gatti-Rodriguez. Kelley-Gainer 1 and Liles-Littles 2 were outstanding fights as well.

                  Some of the old choices were strange.

                  Ali-Jones?

                  Young-Foreman over Saad-M. Johnson 1?

                  Foreman-Frazier? Sure, if you like your fights to resemble a father beating his child.

                  Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                  I have no idea how Spinks v Holmes made FOTY.
                  What list are you going by?

                  The Ring had Hagler-Hearns for 1985 and Cruz-McGuigan in 1986.
                  Last edited by Thread Stealer; 04-29-2009, 07:43 PM.

                  Comment

                  • rocky_balboa23
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 2015
                    • 236
                    • 226
                    • 12,169

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Thread Stealer
                    I agree, but at the same time, a lot of people who rate it so highly watched it live. That was a super fight, an event, and I'm sure that added to the excitement of seeing it and not knowing what was going to happen (as opposed to watching a tape of it years later).

                    That being said, Hagler-Hearns doesn't rank especially high on my list of best fights.
                    I agree..that's y people who were not yet born at that time will never feel the atmosphere of that super fight, myself included..so i just have to rely on experts for their views of the fight..it's i guess the same when in the future ill tell my grandchildren about the Morales-Pacman trilogy..they will never understand wat i felt when i was watching that trilogy..i was so emotionally attached with those fights coz Pac lost the 1st fight..it was sweet revenge in the end..u have to be there to feel it..

                    Comment

                    • Dynamite Kid
                      Slicker than your average
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2007
                      • 20701
                      • 627
                      • 209
                      • 38,291

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Thread Stealer


                      Are we talking about the same Carbajal-Gonzalez fight? The first one?
                      Yeah man. It was good but not GREAT. I suppose the KD added to it etc, but...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP