Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacman vs Hitman Tale of the Tape... Interesting

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Is this even official?

    I don't particularly trust a tale of the tape from Pacquiaovideo.com....

    Comment


    • #32
      maestro has a point. So pacman was weight drained when he fought marquez. Good thing he still won. Can't say the same for dela hoya, xcaret aka maestro
      Last edited by dugongpinoy; 04-29-2009, 03:15 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        Interesting information.

        I just hope if Hatton wins, people don't make the excuse he is bigger, in light of these numbers.

        But I imagine it will be the first thing Kellerman says.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
          thanks for proving my point.......moorer is a natural light heavyweight....he gained mass to go up to heavyweight....hes NATURAL(frame) build is that of a light heavyweight......that means the heavyweight guys he fought were NATURALLY bigger.....you said the exact samethin i said in my previous post kid...

          No, Moorer was able to go to heavyweight because he had the frame that allowed him to. Same with Holyfield. If Moorer was a small LHW then he probably could not have made it as a HW fighter at least not successfully.


          Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
          roach said that pac was dehydrated a bit in the 2nd marquez fight, and made 135 pretty well.....
          That statement doesn't make senes.


          Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
          pac at this stage of his carear is a natural lightweight......hatton this has always been his weight at 140....its whats natural to his body and frame....not pac....use logic
          wtf..... at this stage, a natural lightweight? first off, WHAT THE *** DO YOU MEAN? People have the body that will enable them to put on a certain amount of weight. That's what natural size is, not the current lean body mass. Also, who the *** are you to judge Pac's best weight, when people who know him much better (like Freddie and Pac himself) said 140 is a much better weight for him?




          Originally posted by J.B.moneY. View Post
          hatton is the bigger guy....anybody that doesnt understand what being "bigger: means in boxing clearly doesnt follow the sport.

          No, Hatton is not a "bigger" guy, at least not by any significant amount. Hatton's size advantage is not enough to give any kind of trouble whatsoever.

          Bigger in boxing sense means that the other guy is much stronger or MUCH bigger that his opponents punches won't affect him and his punches will be too much for his opponent. CLEARLY not the case here.


          How funny do you think it is when someone who is the same in virtually all measurements is called "much bigger" and that he'll overpower the other guy because he'll weigh just a few more pounds come fight night.




          btw how much do you weigh? what is your weight class and how tall are you?

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR View Post
            What was it??????//Edit. I hav it in my bets thread, check the link in my sig!!!!
            LMAO @ the Floydhuggations!

            Comment


            • #36
              Pac looked solid at 147 and still had his speed and stamina. Hatton isnt really that much bigger than him and he needs to depend on more than a size advantage and have a strategy other than that in mind.

              I am moving from hatton to pac for my predictions now. I think Hatton is not mentally prepared to find out that Pac is much stronger than he expected.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by jching View Post
                Is this even official?

                I don't particularly trust a tale of the tape from Pacquiaovideo.com....
                How about this one?





                100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live *** cam - easy as 1-2-3

                Comment


                • #38
                  Pacman is NOT bigger then Hatton lol and that tale of the tape is aload of bollocks (like most of them) Hatton does not have 9 1/2 inch forearms LMAO, do you realise how small that is?

                  Pacmans wrist is also not 8inchs, Mike Tysons was 7 3/4.

                  Hatton is bigger

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pacmanjay View Post


                    How funny do you think it is when someone who is the same in virtually all measurements is called "much bigger" and that he'll overpower the other guy because he'll weigh just a few more pounds come fight night.
                    He is bigger, please don't tell me you trust some poxy tale of the tape.



                    oh look hattons gained half an inch on his wrist since then.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Wood23ard View Post
                      Pacman is NOT bigger then Hatton lol and that tale of the tape is aload of bollocks (like most of them) Hatton does not have 9 1/2 inch forearms LMAO, do you realise how small that is?

                      Pacmans wrist is also not 8inchs, Mike Tysons was 7 3/4.

                      Hatton is bigger

                      Hatton is bigger he just aint that much bigger. I am worried with Hatton talking about it all the time that he is focused on the size issue too much and not on other strategies. If he gets in there and Pac is stronger than he expected I dont know if Hatton is prepared for that mentally.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP