Pacquiao Aims for Four (and Six): Real History Part VIII

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Pacquiao Aims for Four (and Six): Real History Part VIII

    By Cliff Rold - In this series, culminating with the May 2nd showdown between Manny Pacquiao (48-3-2, 36 KO) and World Junior Welterweight champion Ricky Hatton (45-1, 32 KO) now only days away, Pacquiao’s previous title claims in five weight divisions were examined. Identified were three lineal titles at Flyweight, Featherweight, and Jr. Lightweight. Against Hatton, Pacquiao goes for overall title for lineal title number four. How historically significant would it be? [details]
  • chinoy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 1104
    • 326
    • 350
    • 7,909

    #2
    thanks crold

    Oscar Dela Hoya: All Time Great....

    Comment

    • DonTaseMeBrah
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 5828
      • 683
      • 575
      • 6,409

      #3
      All time great boxing career money & fame wise, but as a boxer/fighter, just a very good HOF career. Not a all time great.

      Comment

      • chinoy
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 1104
        • 326
        • 350
        • 7,909

        #4
        Originally posted by GetSumBrah
        All time great boxing career money & fame wise, but as a boxer/fighter, just a very good HOF career. Not a all time great.
        in my book, he is

        Comment

        • Dave Rado
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 8064
          • 266
          • 453
          • 14,460

          #5
          Originally posted by GetSumBrah
          All time great boxing career money & fame wise, but as a boxer/fighter, just a very good HOF career. Not a all time great.
          Depends on the definition of ATG. The most common definition is "top 100 of all time", and I think he'd get into the top 100.

          He's not on the level of the Ray Robinsons or the Willie Peps, obviously.

          Comment

          • MBerrido
            Amateur
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • May 2008
            • 28
            • 2
            • 0
            • 6,072

            #6
            Why does this article say that DLH is the lineal champ at 154 yet in the FMJ article it's only 'hazy' that Mayweather is the lineal champ?

            Comment

            • Jim Jeffries
              rugged individualist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 20741
              • 1,376
              • 2,868
              • 54,838

              #7
              Originally posted by GetSumBrah
              All time great boxing career money & fame wise, but as a boxer/fighter, just a very good HOF career. Not a all time great.
              Not really sure how you could keep him off of the top 50 ATG list.

              Comment

              • JmH Reborn
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 4874
                • 238
                • 127
                • 12,377

                #8
                Originally posted by MBerrido
                Why does this article say that DLH is the lineal champ at 154 yet in the FMJ article it's only 'hazy' that Mayweather is the lineal champ?
                If I'm reading it correctly, he's talking about Oscar's first reign as JMW champ in which he lost to Shane, which Shane lost to Winky.

                Winky gave up his titles to move up to MW. So in fact, Winky was the last man to be lineal champ. Oscar got a title from Ricardo Mayorga, which Floyd won, but there was no set path since Winky won then vacated.

                Honestly...the lineage stuff confuses me on how it's determined. I wish to be educated...especially now reading the JMW entry. So if Winky gave it up and no clear path was set since then. How do we get a lineal champ again @154?

                Comment

                • Heru
                  Quintessence
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 9491
                  • 531
                  • 353
                  • 26,205

                  #9
                  Originally posted by MBerrido
                  Why does this article say that DLH is the lineal champ at 154 yet in the FMJ article it's only 'hazy' that Mayweather is the lineal champ?
                  Because Rold is not referring to the second title reign, which was the Mayorga win and Mayweather loss. It's the first title reign, which was the Castillejo win and the eventual Mosley loss.

                  Castillejo's title had a lineage from Terry Norris, Mayorga's title was vacant when he won it and it was against Picirillo.

                  Comment

                  • Dave Rado
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 8064
                    • 266
                    • 453
                    • 14,460

                    #10
                    Originally posted by JmH Reborn
                    Honestly...the lineage stuff confuses me on how it's determined. I wish to be educated...especially now reading the JMW entry. So if Winky gave it up and no clear path was set since then. How do we get a lineal champ again @154?
                    If there's a lineal champion, the title can only be won by beating the champion.

                    If the title has been vacated, the title can only be won if the #1 and #2 contenders fight each other, or very occasionally if the #1 and #3 contenders fight each other.

                    As you say, the Jnr Middleweight title has been vacant since Winky vacated.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP