Whos a more talented fighter? Froch or Margarito

[Check]

I say Froch has more skill as a fighter. Both have good stamina and both have a great chin. I think Margarito cuts off the ring better but Froch is more polished IMO. I am talking about a Margarito without plastered fists of course.

[ACHlLLES]

I say Froch has more skill as a fighter. Both have good stamina and both have a great chin. I think Margarito cuts off the ring better but Froch is more polished IMO. I am talking about a Margarito without plastered fists of course.

I would say Margarito since his workrate is impressive, but who knows if Margarito cheated to get his wins... So, I'll go with Froch on the default. Froch might not be the best boxer but atleast he doesn't cheat

[Mugwump]

Froch doesn't cheat.

End of discussion.

[REMOVED SHARK 97]

Froch needs to use steel and not plaster to make his punches more effective.

The plaster would just crumble.

[Haterfree]

Margarito was a cheater & it seemed that his fan base consisted mostly of racist liars so would have to go with Froch.

[deuce_drop]

Froch needs to use steel and not plaster to make his punches more effective.

there is some truth to what you're saying, because last night a few of us watching the fight at my house were saying that if froch hit harder he would've had taylor out earlier in the fight, because there was some shots where froch was tagging taylor and taylor was able to deal with his power, it wasn't until taylor started gassing that he couldn't defend himself properly and got "GOT".........

i think that if froch hit harder, he would've had taylor out of there by the 10th round, and maybe would've won some rounds or more decisively, however you look at it, had froch had more pop he would've been able to handle taylor easier.

[-EX-]

Froch. Margarito can punch that's it. Froch doesn't block punches entirely with his face.

[Jean28]

Froch because margarito simply sux