If Paul Williams Ko's Cotto Would You be Impressed?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bhopreign
    Banned
    • Jun 2006
    • 11273
    • 419
    • 100
    • 12,036

    #21
    Originally posted by Spray_resistant
    Ok, so Taylor can beat Hopkins and get ko'd by Pavlik and Pavlik can be schooled by B-hop.....your math sucks.
    So by your theory Hopkins gets no credit for beating Pavlik?

    Comment

    • Spray_resistant
      Edgelord Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 29159
      • 2,702
      • 1,439
      • 53,384

      #22
      Originally posted by Bhopreign
      So by your theory Hopkins gets no credit for beating Pavlik?
      He does because this issue has nothing to with the visually obvious physical advantages you see between Cotto and Paul Williams.

      Comment

      • THRILLA77
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 1100
        • 15
        • 1
        • 1,402

        #23
        Originally posted by spray_resistant
        i was thinking earlier this evening, sure paul williams can go back to ww if he wants and if he makes the 147lb limit i guess he isn't breaking any rules by fighting there....but lets say he went back down to ww and fought cotto for any random trinket title lets say the wbc because it looks the coolest, and in this fight lets say pw overwhelmed cotto and eventually stopped him. If this happened does this make williams look better i.e add to his legacy? Does it make him look bad for beating up on smaller guys? Or does it have no effect on the public's perception of him? I say he looks bad, and it wouldn't prove anything that most informed fans wouldn't have presumed in the 1st place.....opinions, comments........
        yea i would be impressed...but in reality i believe cotto would win this fight

        Comment

        • Bhopreign
          Banned
          • Jun 2006
          • 11273
          • 419
          • 100
          • 12,036

          #24
          Originally posted by Spray_resistant
          He does because this issue has nothing to with the visually obvious physical advantages you see between Cotto and Paul Williams.
          What advantage does Williams have other than reach?

          Comment

          • Ch@mpBox@PR
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 21432
            • 432
            • 279
            • 22,261

            #25
            Originally posted by Mr. Boat Buyer
            How can a middleweight fight Cotto if Williams has to weigh 147 on the scales you clwon.
            Well according too your Butt buddy, Bhopreing DLH Nor Tito Weremt WWs.

            You Figure that one?

            Comment

            • Spray_resistant
              Edgelord Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 29159
              • 2,702
              • 1,439
              • 53,384

              #26
              Originally posted by Bhopreign
              What advantage does Williams have other than reach?
              So you don't agree that he is a naturally bigger man?

              Comment

              • Burner
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 9090
                • 346
                • 51
                • 9,623

                #27
                Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                He does because this issue has nothing to with the visually obvious physical advantages you see between Cotto and Paul Williams.
                Boxing is based on weight.

                NOT HEIGHT AND REACH NEWBIE.

                And Williams doesnt even use his height..he gives up to go to toe to toewith his opponents...

                Go watch boxing first then make a thread.

                Comment

                • Ch@mpBox@PR
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 21432
                  • 432
                  • 279
                  • 22,261

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Bhopreign
                  Those "welterweights" were middleweight champs, no excuses.
                  So FLoyd should fight at JMW, because he grabbed a Belt there?

                  You spew some much bull ****, that you dont make any type of sense, STFU!!!!!!!!!

                  Comment

                  • Bhopreign
                    Banned
                    • Jun 2006
                    • 11273
                    • 419
                    • 100
                    • 12,036

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Spray_resistant
                    So you don't agree that he is a naturally bigger man?
                    Naturally taller yes.

                    Comment

                    • Bhopreign
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 11273
                      • 419
                      • 100
                      • 12,036

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
                      So FLoyd should fight at JMW, because he grabbed a Belt there?

                      You spew some much bull ****, that you dont make any type of sense, STFU!!!!!!!!!
                      He could...skill win fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP