Better for BOXING????Hatton Win or Pac Win?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FreshPrince
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 1929
    • 70
    • 0
    • 8,282

    #51
    Originally posted by hammerhiem
    You sent me a red K because your a Pachugger? Thats some pathetic **** right there.
    Somebody give this guy red k for havin "Joe lewis" in his top 10 p4p of all time.

    Comment

    • mellow_mood
      BORICUA 110%
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 14133
      • 297
      • 614
      • 20,603

      #52
      this is a no brainer...

      pacman have the momentum....and the spot light right on him!!!!!!. dont see how come ppl think that hatton wnning is better for boxing...

      Comment

      • LIL_KULIT808
        Banned
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 810
        • 141
        • 77
        • 1,220

        #53
        Originally posted by The Weebler II
        I do, at 140 and with a decent ref.
        ^^^^ lol sucker!!!

        Comment

        • them_apples
          Lord
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 9764
          • 1,180
          • 900
          • 41,722

          #54
          If Hatton wins people we just say Mayweather was better and wish Mayweather was still fighting.

          If Pacquiao wins boxing will be even better.

          Comment

          • J.B.moneY.
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 2361
            • 100
            • 73
            • 8,609

            #55
            Sure I'm biased....but I think a Hatton win is better for boxing, it throws everything out of whack.....and if Hatton wins not by much....we can always do a hatton-pac 2....hell even a new great trilogy.

            Comment

            • LIL_KULIT808
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 810
              • 141
              • 77
              • 1,220

              #56
              Originally posted by J.B.moneY.
              Sure I'm biased....but I think a Hatton win is better for boxing, it throws everything out of whack.....and if Hatton wins not by much....we can always do a hatton-pac 2....hell even a new great trilogy.
              whaaaaaat????
              you know pacman is gonna retired in 2010 right!!!
              man i rather see pacman vs jmm
              hatton just aint in pacmann's level homeboy!!!

              Comment

              • shade darkar
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 6460
                • 227
                • 337
                • 12,996

                #57
                well id say that it is brilliant for boxing either way. Everybody is intrested in this fight and it draws attention to the sport from the casual fans. Its better that this fight is taking place rather than it not. This is what boxing should be about, 2 world class fighters going toe to toe. If hatton wins then it gets him closer to a mayweather rematch which is what he wants although i appreciate that its not what alot of fans want to see. But there is still enough intrest in the UK alone for that rematch to be validated. If pacman wins, then it probably leads to a mayweather fight aswell. As a hatton fan i hope the rematch happens as i was disgusted by joe cortez and i think mayweater snr has made a good difference. Im not blinded tho, i still consider mayweather the 70/30 favourite at least. Credit still goes to hatton for stepping up to a weight that suited his opponent better. It was clear to see hatton didnt get a fair shot at mayweather espescially as cortez allowed hopkins to fight inside all night against calzaghe. Feel free to reply with your thoughts......

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP