Morales and barrera was still in 20s when pacman beat them

[shadeyfizzle]

Roach said Pac was "new and improved" with his "Manila Ice" Right hand in the FIRST fight with Morales. He said he improved him and made him a two handed fighter after being labled one-dimensional in the 1st Marquez fight. He said Pac would walk through Morales with ease since he was on the DECLINE.

Morales smoked the two handed Pacquiao with ease. Manila FAIL right hand, LOL

"Manila Ice" wasnt until Pac-Morales 2 ******.

[Maestro USA]

"Manila Ice" wasnt until Pac-Morales 2 ******.

WRONG!

Watch the british broadcast. They clearly mention it as Pacquiao walks into the ring.

[winac]

There were doubts being raised about whether Morales was loosing it before the second Barrera fight. When he first beat Pacquiao he was coming off a loss, therefore Pacquiao shouldn't have been fighting him, he should have been fighting Barrera and that would have been a possible great win. He also made the same mistake fighting MAB after his loss to Marquez, tut tut. Furthermore not only did he fight Morales when he shouldn't have been, he lost to him. After that fight Morales was schooled by Zahir Raheem and instead of fighting Raheem and letting Morales proving he still had it in a comeback fight, he took on the Morales that had lost two of his last three. As it is Morales wasn't ablt to prove he wasn't past it for the rest of his career losing 5 of his last 6 fights. Even if you wanted t claim Pacquiao ruined Morales, it is hard for that to sound convincing because he had lost to Raheem and Barrera before PACman

[portuge puncher]

its because of all there hard fights, pac-man didnt have any wars before he fought them, those WERE pac-mans wars, i think its a testament to barrera and moralas that they had something left to fight pacquio

[FasTHarD]

There were doubts being raised about whether Morales was loosing it before the second Barrera fight. When he first beat Pacquiao he was coming off a loss, therefore Pacquiao shouldn't have been fighting him, he should have been fighting Barrera and that would have been a possible great win. He also made the same mistake fighting MAB after his loss to Marquez, tut tut. Furthermore not only did he fight Morales when he shouldn't have been, he lost to him. After that fight Morales was schooled by Zahir Raheem and instead of fighting Raheem and letting Morales proving he still had it in a comeback fight, he took on the Morales that had lost two of his last three. As it is Morales wasn't ablt to prove he wasn't past it for the rest of his career losing 5 of his last 6 fights. Even if you wanted t claim Pacquiao ruined Morales, it is hard for that to sound convincing because he had lost to Raheem and Barrera before PACman

What you mean Pac should fight Raheem after Raheem beats Morales?
Why should Pac fights Raheem. I didn't even notice that guy before he beats Morales. And to let you know and it sad to say Morales can't beat any lightweight. Pac really did destroy Morales, no fighters have done such a bad beating against Morales.

[Maestro USA]

There were doubts being raised about whether Morales was loosing it before the second Barrera fight. When he first beat Pacquiao he was coming off a loss, therefore Pacquiao shouldn't have been fighting him, he should have been fighting Barrera and that would have been a possible great win. He also made the same mistake fighting MAB after his loss to Marquez, tut tut. Furthermore not only did he fight Morales when he shouldn't have been, he lost to him. After that fight Morales was schooled by Zahir Raheem and instead of fighting Raheem and letting Morales proving he still had it in a comeback fight, he took on the Morales that had lost two of his last three. As it is Morales wasn't ablt to prove he wasn't past it for the rest of his career losing 5 of his last 6 fights. Even if you wanted t claim Pacquiao ruined Morales, it is hard for that to sound convincing because he had lost to Raheem and Barrera before PACman

Co-Sign!

HBO said "Pacquiao should not get in the ring against Raheem, he should go back down and knockout more featherweights" LMAO

They knew Raheem just dominated a fighter Pac got his ass whooped by, and judging by the scared look on Pac's face while watching the fight, they suggest Pac to DUCK Raheem. HBO said Morales was shot and shouldn't even fight Pac in the rematch. Instead of fighting Raheem, Pac chooses his leftovers and fights the shot Morales. How pathetic, LOL

[Jose Rizal]

Pacman and marqueaz now in 30s and still in their prime. So please stop giving excuses

As long as Pac continues his winning ways, the excuses will never end, but you'll get used to it. Then to ease their pain for their fighters' loss, there's always the ridiculous fantasy match ups that some so-called "knowledgeable fans" come up with that Pac will never win in their minds. At least they can get some form of satisfaction analyzing how Pac hasn't got a prayer and how he's gonna get beaten to a pulp by these legends.

To them he's just an overrated, one-dimensional and lucky Asian midget that if you support him before a fight, you're virtually declaring yourself to these board as being devoid of any boxing knowledge, yet after he wins, that basically signals the loser has reached the threshold becoming old, a has-been, over-the-hill, shot, etc. because that's the only way he could win. You know the drill and you'll see it right after the May 2nd fight.

[Jose Rizal]

Co-Sign!

HBO said "Pacquiao should not get in the ring against Raheem, he should go back down and knockout more featherweights" LMAO

They knew Raheem just dominated a fighter Pac got his ass whooped by, and judging by the scared look on Pac's face while watching the fight, they suggest Pac to DUCK Raheem. HBO said Morales was shot and shouldn't even fight Pac in the rematch. Instead of fighting Raheem, Pac chooses his leftovers and fights the shot Morales. How pathetic, LOL

You mean super featherweight noob Pacquiao ducked lightweight Raheem? I love these boards.

[MR. NUTHUGGER]

And how many times did he get up?

He went down 4 times ofcourse he'll get up 4 times.

[winac]

No the point is he should have looked for another fight while Morales proved he still had what it takes, by beating a solid opponent. If he was going to fight someone in that fight it should have been the victor, Instead he fought the loser and made him coe back down from lightweight