Better Heavyweight era: 70s or 90s?
Collapse
-
No way '90s Holyfield is better than the Frazier that beat Ali in '71 in the "Fight of the Century"
You have an argument with Bowe & Lewis, though I'd take Foreman over Lewis.
And I don't see how we can take Old Foreman over Old Ali, when Old Ali beat a top 5 all-time HW in young Foreman, Joe Frazier twice, & Ken Norton, who are all Hall of Famers
Old Foreman's best victory is Michael Moorer.
He lost to Tommy Morrison, Holyfield, and Shannon Briggs.Comment
-
We both have preference.
No way '90s Holyfield is better than the Frazier that beat Ali in '71 in the "Fight of the Century"
You have an argument with Bowe & Lewis, though I'd take Foreman over Lewis.
And I don't see how we can take Old Foreman over Old Ali, when Old Ali beat a top 5 all-time HW in young Foreman, Joe Frazier twice, & Ken Norton, who are all Hall of Famers
Old Foreman's best victory is Michael Moorer.
He lost to Tommy Morrison, Holyfield, and Shannon Briggs.
Moore > Frazier, Norton
Old Ali (as close to Old George's age as possible) doesn't have a best win.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
60-s and 70-s are very good era.
90-s is pretty overrated. 50 old Foreman was able to win a world championship belt, enough said. The same Foreman retired in 70-s because he couldn`t beat Ali.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ali was totally washed up by the age of 36, he had like 60 fights. He fought all the best guys in 60-s and 70-s. he was in too many wars.
Foreman retired when he was 28. Came back 10 years later, fought all bums they could have found for him to secure world title shots.
A strange comparison.
Comment

Comment