Gerald McClellan vs Kelly Pavlik @ 160

[wolfgang]

McClellan=one of the most overrated fighters of the last 20 years.

I think your one of the most overrated posters on here.

[wolfgang]

'm not sure if you have any knowledge of what I'm talking about.

Jackson's diminishing eyesight surely did him no good against a puncher like McClellan. There's a reason why he was losing to the likes of Quincy Taylor not soon after and was forced to retire.

Griffith and Napoles were 5'7 welterweights (in Napoles' case a former lightweight) in their mid 30's going up against a prime, over 6 feet tall big middleweight in Carlos Monzon.

lol Julian was 17-0 after his first loss to McCallum, the reason he was beat by Quincy Taylor, was because Mcclellan brutal knocked him out twice and ruined him for good.

[Kinetic Linking]

g-man pretty much beat guys in 3 rounds, kelly takes a little longer. Both terrifying middleweights.

[TheGreatA]

and the g-man already had the brain clog in his brain by then, no body mentions that

No he didn't. It was actually after the first Julian Jackson fight that McClellan started having problems.

lol Julian was 17-0 after his first loss to McCallum, the reason he was beat by Quincy Taylor, was because Mcclellan brutal knocked him out twice and ruined him for good.

Jackson didn't look that great in his previous fights, going the distance with Tate, and looked horrible afterwards, unable to KO journeymen such as Eduardo Ayala and Leonardo Aguilar, and losing to Quincy Taylor. He had already fought for 12 years with a style that was most certainly not made for longevity.

Now McClellan could possibly beat even the best version of Jackson but having only one good name on your resume, a 33 year old Julian Jackson, hardly makes you a great fighter.

[Scott9945]

I think your one of the most overrated posters on here.

And you are a pathetic fanboy of McClellan, who was one of the worst human beings in boxing history.

[street bully]

TS must hate Pavlik.