This BS! The WBC,WBO,IBF,WBA all BS they're just out there to **** the fighters over. Why can't he keep both belts and have the option to defend them both? What was the point of fighting to unify?
Timothy Bradley Given an Ultimatum By The WBC
Collapse
-
-
This is straight up bull****. Every fighter should now say "fuck the WBC" and drop their green piece of **** belt.Comment
-
-
Couldn't be more different. Bradley isn't refusing to fight a mandatory, it's simply that the WBC say they will not allow any of their title holders to hold onto another organisation's belt any more. Which is disgusting.Last edited by Dave Rado; 04-09-2009, 01:30 PM.Comment
-
Good point. It's a shame the interviewer didn't raise that with him.Isn't Kelly Pavlik defending both his WBC and WBO belts against Sergio Mora in June? Hasn't Pavlik been beltholder of both WBC and WBO since Sept 2007 (Pavlik-Taylor I)? Didn't Pavlik defend both belts against Taylor (rematch), Locket and Rubio?
I don't recall Sulaiman and company ever raising their hackles over any of these past Pavlik fights and they appear impervious about any possible violation of their unification "rules" on the forthcoming Mora meeting.Comment
Comment